Twister sequal

Gorm

With any luck we will be there by Tuesday.
Jul 6, 2010
5,847
2,727
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
I also heard Reed Timmer was going to be involved in this somehow as well.

Wouldn't surprise me if we see some sort of armored car tornado intercept in the movie like Reed and his team do.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gunnerclone

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,955
74,717
113
America
giphy.gif
I really miss the 90s
 

Cyclonsin

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 4, 2020
2,390
4,944
113
36
Savannah, GA
Does the first movie have a cult-like following or something? I liked the original, but a little embarrassed to admit it.
Really? I'm not sure I've ever talked to someone who didn't like it. Personally, I've always loved it and have zero reluctance in saying as much.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Arkansas Cyclone

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,972
41,712
113
Waukee
Can't imagine this one will be nearly as good as the original. There are just some movies that there is not a good reason to make a sequel of and this is probably one of them. Is Hollywood really running out of new/original ideas for movies these days?

I can only think of three "way too late" sequels that were any good --

Mad Mad: Fury Road
Top Gun: Maverick
Finding Dory


If Twisters were to succeed as a film, I think there are some lessons to be learned here --

(1.) DO NOT REHASH THE SAME PLOT AS THE ORIGINAL FILM. A few references and homages are okay, but this one needs to stand on its own with its own characters and conflicts.

Stay as far away from The Force Awakens as you can.

(2.) Adding diversity is fine if it fits the story or makes an interesting point (e.g., Fury Road and its feminist characters and themes, Maverick and its female and nonwhite pilots that are treated as professionals and not there to meet some quota/Phoenix is not treated as eye candy but only as a pilot). But if all you got is "It's an inferior version of the film you've already seen but diverse!" then you have a problem.

(3.) Older characters can't "start" where they "ended" decades previously in the last film. A lot of time has passed, much has changed. How about we use Maverick as a demonstration of this --

Maverick at the end of Top Gun had matured from the hotdogging "go it alone" punk that he started as, learning much about loss and the terrible burden of responsibility for your decisions from Goose's death and the need to make, trust, and support friends in saving and making peace with Iceman.

Maverick at the beginning of Maverick is a man who has lived a long life and is burdened with regrets. Goose still haunts him in the background, he alienated Goose's son/Maverick's metaphorical son being overprotective, his womanizing ways cost him his best a chance at a wife and stable family life, and Iceman, instead of his rival, is now his best and lifelong friend. He's not just a hotshot who learned a few lessons the hard way, he's a real person late in life with a lifetime of burdens from the decisions he's made hanging over him.

As opposed to...

When we first meet Han Solo in A New Hope, he's an arrogant, selfish smuggler with one friend (and one who seems to only barely tolerate him as much as you can interpret Wookie speech).

He has completely changed by the end of The Return of the Jedi. He's a general in the Alliance military, leads a special forces unit, and willing to put himself in danger to protect his friends. He throws himself in front of a wounded Leah and gives Lando his beloved Millennium Falcon to pilot during the attack on the second Death Star because he knows it gives him the best chance of success and survival.

Come The Force Awakens... he's a deadbeat smuggler again. WTF!?! Did nothing happen???


Philip Seymour Hoffman was so overqualified for Twister.

And I loved it.

Him blasting the "Boléro" section from Deep Purple's "Child in Time" over the prairies and yelling "LOSER!" over and over again at the Dread Pirate Roberts was some high-quality cinema.
 
Last edited:

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,926
14,032
113
Really? I'm not sure I've ever talked to someone who didn't like it. Personally, I've always loved it and have zero reluctance in saying as much.
It's a dumb fun movie. Not everything has to be Citizen Kane. People sometimes don't like to admit they like bubble gum.
 

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,468
28,853
113
40
Driftless Region
Visit site
I'll watch it but the likelihood of it being anywhere close to as good as the original is about zero.
I watched the original for the first time in 20 years recently, and thought it was almost insultingly bad. Totally unrealistic scenarios with the tornadoes and lots of Midwest stereotyping.

It’s fun, but it’s dumb as hell.
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,972
41,712
113
Waukee
I watched the original for the first time in 20 years recently, and thought it was almost insultingly bad. Totally unrealistic scenarios with the tornadoes and lots of Midwest stereotyping.

It’s fun, but it’s dumb as hell.

I like how it is supposed to be set in Oklahoma but it clearly looks like Iowa or eastern Nebraska.

Oklahoma is not mostly green rolling hills with a lot of cornfields.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CascadeClone

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,682
80,074
113
DSM
I watched the original for the first time in 20 years recently, and thought it was almost insultingly bad. Totally unrealistic scenarios with the tornadoes and lots of Midwest stereotyping.

It’s fun, but it’s dumb as hell.

When Twister came out the first Moore F5 was still 3 years away. Tim Samiris wouldn’t die in the el Reno tornado for another 17 years. There’s probably going to be a lot more “sciencey” stuff in this movie. Chasing was a super-niche thing back when Twister came out. Now it’s mainstream and a decent business. I expect this movie to have a darker tone being well after Moore, Moore 2, El Reno, Parkersburg, Joplin, etc.
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
13,030
21,016
113
I can only think of three "way too late" sequels that were any good --

Mad Mad: Fury Road
Top Gun: Maverick
Finding Dory


If Twisters were to succeed as a film, I think there are some lessons to be learned here --

(1.) DO NOT REHASH THE SAME PLOT AS THE ORIGINAL FILM. A few references and homages are okay, but this one needs to stand on its own with its own characters and conflicts.

Stay as far away from The Force Awakens as you can.

(2.) Adding diversity is fine if it fits the story or makes an interesting point (e.g., Fury Road and its feminist characters and themes, Maverick and its female and nonwhite pilots that are treated as professionals and not there to meet some quota/Phoenix is not treated as eye candy but only as a pilot). But if all you got is "It's an inferior version of the film you've already seen but diverse!" then you have a problem.

(3.) Older characters can't "start" where they "ended" decades previously in the last film. A lot of time has passed, much has changed. How about we use Maverick as a demonstration of this --

Maverick at the end of Top Gun had matured from the hotdogging "go it alone" punk that he started as, learning much about loss and the terrible burden of responsibility for your decisions from Goose's death and the need to make, trust, and support friends in saving and making peace with Iceman.

Maverick at the beginning of Maverick is a man who has lived a long life and is burdened with regrets. Goose still haunts him in the background, he alienated Goose's son/Maverick's metaphorical son being overprotective, his womanizing ways cost him his best a chance at a wife and stable family life, and Iceman, instead of his rival, is now his best and lifelong friend. He's not just a hotshot who learned a few lessons the hard way, he's a real person late in life with a lifetime of burdens from the decisions he's made hanging over him.

As opposed to...

When we first meet Han Solo in A New Hope, he's an arrogant, selfish smuggler with one friend (and one who seems to only barely tolerate him as much as you can interpret Wookie speech).

He has completely changed by the end of The Return of the Jedi. He's a general in the Alliance military, leads a special forces unit, and willing to put himself in danger to protect his friends. He throws himself in front of a wounded Leah and gives Lando his beloved Millennium Falcon to pilot during the attach on the second Death Star because he knows it gives him the best chance of success and survival.

Come The Force Awakens... he's a deadbeat smuggler again. WTF!?! Did nothing happen???



Philip Seymour Hoffman was so overqualified for Twister.

And I loved it.

Him blasting the "Boléro" section from Deep Purple's "Child in Time" over the prairies and yelling "LOSER!" over and over again at the Dread Pirate Roberts was some high-quality cinema.
Didn't see Maverick. Saw Finding Dory but don't remember a single thing about it and might have even fallen asleep even though Finding Nemo was great.

But I'm 100% with you on Fury Road, except I'd pretty much say, "if you want to figure out the right way to damn near anything in a movie, look at Fury Road."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sigmapolis

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2007
16,195
25,059
113
Minneapolis
Supposedly Helen Hunt has already agreed to be in it.
Would love to see the links to that. Every article I have read says they 'hope' to bring her back or that she 'may' come back. Would be cool. But she is known as a huge B in the industry. She was actually in our town parade for this movie when it was being filmed. Paxton was awesome. Hunt couldn't get out of town fast enough.
 

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2007
16,195
25,059
113
Minneapolis
Looks like this thing is happening and apparently Spielberg is involved.


Spielberg being involved isn't shocking at all. He's not directing it but his production company Amblin Entertainment backed the original so makes sense due to that one's success it will do the same for this.

Amblin also was behind Arachnophobia back in the day. Swore I heard they were re-doing that but maybe I'm dreaming.
 
Last edited:

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,972
41,712
113
Waukee
Didn't see Maverick. Saw Finding Dory but don't remember a single thing about it and might have even fallen asleep even though Finding Nemo was great.

But I'm 100% with you on Fury Road, except I'd pretty much say, "if you want to figure out the right way to damn near anything in a movie, look at Fury Road."

Maverick isn't The Godfather, but is one heck of an action film relative to the CGI dreck we're inundated with nowadays. I'd much rather watch real aircraft do real things (with some CGI to enhance) than, say, massively overqualified A-List actors punch each other and read stupid quips in front of a green screen in yet another Marvel sequel or something like Ford v. Ferrari over The Fast and the Furious. Stupid action is great, but try to give me at least something new and at least some depth of character and themes. And action grounded in the reality of what real aircraft/cars/people can do is always going to be more interesting.

I know it is football season, but it was definitely worth the price to see it in a theater.

Finding Dory benefits from the complete lack of competition in this arena. But it doesn't entirely rehash the original or denigrate its legacy somehow, so I included it on the list. It is definitely the weakest of the three. And you're 100% right -- Fury Road is simply one of the great films ever made. But the fact it was 30 years after Beyond Thunderdome and nobody gave it a chance only makes it all the more impressive.
 

TXCyclones

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 13, 2011
11,415
12,628
113
TX
We were traveling through OK a few years ago and our route took us a couple miles from Wakita, so we took a quick detour to check things out. A quick internet search said Aunt Meg's house was there and the town had a Twister museum. We found out Aunt Meg's house had been torn down and a butterfly garden had been planted on the lot. The museum had a sign instructing you to call and someone would come down to let you in.

House at the end of the movie - I grew up in that area. It's still there.

The road where the combine and gas tanker crossed over was just outside of Cambridge, IA on 580th Ave. There was a scorch-mark on the pavement forever (might still be there). Bill Paxton used to go up to the bar (Chris' Go-go at the time, but now known as the Tattered Toad or something like that) and drink with the locals. He was an awesome guy! Helen Hunt was an awful person.
 

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2007
16,195
25,059
113
Minneapolis
The road where the combine and gas tanker crossed over was just outside of Cambridge, IA on 580th Ave. There was a scorch-mark on the pavement forever (might still be there). Bill Paxton used to go up to the bar (Chris' Go-go at the time, but now known as the Tattered Toad or something like that) and drink with the locals. He was an awesome guy! Helen Hunt was an awful person.
Family used to live in a Victorian painted lady home back then in the area. I'm 99% sure parents were contacted during early production stages for this movie about either filming the outside for shots or asking where other similar homes may be in the area. I'll have to ask them this weekend.