I'm in my mid 40s, so its a stretch to remember that show, but I did watch some reruns when I was a younger. The Turkey Drop episode is legendary.
I'm in my mid 40s, so its a stretch to remember that show, but I did watch some reruns when I was a younger. The Turkey Drop episode is legendary.
We have come a long way in sitcom smokeshows lol
Lol, you're not wrong, but every era has had its quirks when it comes to stuff like that. In the early/mid 80s, Loni Anderson was IT. She even conquered Burt Reynolds, who was arguably the greatest c*cksman of the 20th century.We have come a long way in sitcom smokeshows lol
Didn’t even see you say this before I said what I saidMy hot take is that Parks and Rec is better than The Office (at least after its first 1.5 seasons). I think the character development on Parks and Rec is more complete and makes more sense, and I think they also did a better job with some creativity in the later seasons to keep it from getting stale.
I'm in my mid 40s, so its a stretch to remember that show, but I did watch some reruns when I was a younger. The Turkey Drop episode is legendary.
Will be interesting to see how voting goes, I assume there will be a few matchups of young vs old.
I wouldn't call myself an afficienado by any stretch, but there are a bunch of old ones included here that I've never watched:
WKRP (never even heard of)
Green Acres
Newhart/Bob Newhart
Family Ties
Kotter
Larry Sanders Show
MTM Show
Laverne & Shirley
Newsradio
Taxi
That's not to suggest any of these don't belong, but I won't be voting for any of them.
That only works if the brackets were done by year of the show. I have heard of all of these shows but everything before 1980ish I doubt I have seen more than a handful of episodes that might have been on nick at nite. You’re basically ruling out anyone under 40 from voting for most of these.@CycloneRulzzz
The post above made me think that I have seen almost all of them. But there are a bunch of new ones that I haven't seen.
Thus, I've got a proposed rule: "Don't vote against a show you haven't seen."
Shows shouldn't win or lose just because a bunch of young or old folks haven't seen it.
@CycloneRulzzz
The post above made me think that I have seen almost all of them. But there are a bunch of new ones that I haven't seen.
Thus, I've got a proposed rule: "Don't vote against a show you haven't seen."
Shows shouldn't win or lose just because a bunch of young or old folks haven't seen it.
Only 3 shows have gone off the air rated #1 and two of them are in this bracket as 4 and 5 seeds. Doesn't seem right.Complete Scranton Region
1 The Office
16 Green Acres
8 WKRP in Cincinnati
9 That '70s Show
5 The Andy Griffith Show
12 Will & Grace
4 I Love Lucy
13 3rd Rock From the Sun
6 Roseanne
11 Newhart vs. 11 The Bob Newhart Show
3 Happy Days
14 The Middle
7 Family Ties
10 Parks and Recreation
2 Friends
15 Golden Girls
This is like the committee saying out loud they don’t watch Pac12 basketball lolPark and Rec is a show I've heard great things about but haven't gotten into yet. It's on my to do list of shows to watch.
It's not quite as hard to stay #1 when there are only 12 shows on TV.Only 3 shows have gone off the air rated #1 and two of them are in this bracket as 4 and 5 seeds. Doesn't seem right.
So I assume this argument is why Mary Tyler Moore show got lifted to a 2 seed (along with that upper midwest bias). But then you snub one of the most modern and progressive woman forward sitcoms of all time in Sex and the City.There was some weight given to older shows that carved the path, blazed the trail, etc., and created the TV landscape that later shows were able to build upon. Do appreciate the input though.
Lots of arguments can be made lots of different ways for lots of different shows for sure. Everyone has their opinions, which is what will make the voting interesting and fun.So I assume this argument is why Mary Tyler Moore show got lifted to a 2 seed (along with that upper midwest bias). But then you snub one of the most modern and progressive woman forward sitcoms of all time in Sex and the City.
The amount of shows per decade have a healthy balance but the seeding is extremely skewed older. Like I love Laverne and Shirley but it shouldn't be above Roseanne or Home Improvement or the same seed as How I Met Your Mother
We did discuss Sex and the City, we determined maybe it doesn't fit sitcom but more of rom-com ... it's a fine line there, and one could make an argument of category for several shows that did get into the field.So I assume this argument is why Mary Tyler Moore show got lifted to a 2 seed (along with that upper midwest bias). But then you snub one of the most modern and progressive woman forward sitcoms of all time in Sex and the City.
The amount of shows per decade have a healthy balance but the seeding is extremely skewed older. Like I love Laverne and Shirley but it shouldn't be above Roseanne or Home Improvement or the same seed as How I Met Your Mother
Oh don’t take it as me not appreciating the work you all did for the seeding. We argue about the March Madness tournament in the same way like “what were they thinking?!”We did discuss Sex and the City, we determined maybe it doesn't fit sitcom but more of rom-com ... it's a fine line there, and one could make an argument of category for several shows that did get into the field.
Although we spent extensive effort in discussion, time isn't limitless, we're willing to admit there could be flaws and that if we went back to do it again there could be changes. It's good to hear all feedback, for sure, because if we do another tournament on different topic, some of these ideas could be applicable.
Intentional decision to have animated shows as its own bracket. Mainly because of the number of non-animated sitcoms over the nearly 75 years worthy of consideration. If we can't fit 64 animated shows we can do 32, but there's going to be a ton there and the thinking was it would be best to have a separate tourney for those.Oh don’t take it as me not appreciating the work you all did for the seeding. We argue about the March Madness tournament in the same way like “what were they thinking?!”
So we’re just arguing the same way but this time the selection committee is reading our banter lol
When it comes to is it a sitcom or not, I think a bunch of the ones you listed don’t fit the exact definition of what a sitcom was back in the 70s-90s. Like most from 2000 onwards aren’t even in front of a live (or laugh track) audience which was the classic format.
Also why the decision of excluding animated shows? I don’t think you could fill up a 64 team bracket with good animated shows. There’s probably 10-12 that are good enough and that you could swap in for some of these.