The DCI has information on amounts and sports bet on. So their info will determine which NCAA penalty levels are applicable for each student athlete.
Plus Iowa state laws apply in addition to NCAA rules.
Gamblin…Smoke and Fire
- Thread starter TDclones
- Start date
- Status
Plus Iowa state laws apply in addition to NCAA rules.
From DMR:
"For all other wagering-related violations, such as betting on professional sports, the total dollar value of the wagers will be taken into consideration with the following terms for reinstatement:
"For all other wagering-related violations, such as betting on professional sports, the total dollar value of the wagers will be taken into consideration with the following terms for reinstatement:
- $200 or less: Sports wagering rules and prevention education. The previous penalty was loss of at least 10% of a season.
- $201-$500: Loss of 10% of a season of eligibility, plus rules and prevention education. The previous penalty was up to 50% of a season.
- $501-$800: Loss of 20% of a season of eligibility, plus rules and prevention education. The previous penalty could have cost an athlete an entire season.
- More than $800 gambled: Loss of 30% of eligibility, plus rules and prevention education. The NCAA stipulated that for cumulative wagering that "greatly" exceeds $800 could result in additional loss of eligibility."
I don't have a clue. Unfortunately, the Iowa regulations that went into place with legalized sports betting are being interpreted and consumed differently by different parties. Personally, it doesn't read as it's a crime to bet as an athlete as long as you're of age. But people much smarter on legal matters don't think it's that cut and dry. I have to believe they think that for some legitimate reason.
Also, Iowa State received names that are over the betting age, so there has to have been some probable cause to start investigating those people. None of us know why exactly.
Didn't it start with Iowa Baseball. ISU players were mentioned a few days later IIMC.
There is a lot of wild speculation in this thread as there has been from page 1. What misdemeanor crime is being committed in your hypothetical? Under 21 wagering is a scheduled violation (a fine) so it’s unlikely that there will be a plea agreement as you describe.
We can definitely lose to UNI without the 5 players that have been mentioned in many posts.
Pretty certain the suspensions would take effect immediately so the coaches have no say.
We can definitely lose to UNI with them.
I give the UNI game a 50/50 any year no matter what.
LOL. We will be 20 point favorites... cmon now.
88 not sure if you've been in a coma for a few decades but this game is never a given. If we are giving 20 points bet your house, kids, wife, 401K ....
You guys and your UNI overhype every year.
Nothing more inspiring to the opposition from Spring practices to two a days to be told you can't possibly win this game as you dont have the coaching, talent or crowd to be on the same playing field. On really. Hold. My. Beer.
UNI sucks. Plus the new OL coach will have the OL ampted for this game.
That pertains to the gambling business itself. They have to have controls in place to prevent the stuff listed there.
There is no specific Iowa Code section that pertains to those groups listed that makes it illegal for them to bet.
So from my understanding this all got started with Iowa baseball players betting on the Iowa / South Carolina WBB tournemanet game. Does this mean those baseball players are f****d?
- Status
