I'm confused, so the only charge currently is Tampering with Records of an investigation even though the district attorney publicized that the Dekkers "engaged in a scheme" to allow Hunter to bet under the guise of his Mom? Is the tampering related to the investigation of that or is the tampering charge related to the scheme itself?
If it's the former, which is what the articles I've read seem to insinuate, why publicize an ongoing investigation? That doesn't seem right to me. I would also be curious as to how they are trying to prove that they tampered with electronic records. Did they delete texts/emails after the warrant was issued and if that's the case, why wouldn't the DCI already be in possession of those records after the search warrant was executed in May.
I understand a lot of people take DAs at face value sometimes, but they are prone to mistakes and bias(especially around election times) as well and there's a lot of waiting we'll have to do as more info comes out.
Edit: Ok, so the tampering is from falsifying the account to conceal wrongdoing
If it's the former, which is what the articles I've read seem to insinuate, why publicize an ongoing investigation? That doesn't seem right to me. I would also be curious as to how they are trying to prove that they tampered with electronic records. Did they delete texts/emails after the warrant was issued and if that's the case, why wouldn't the DCI already be in possession of those records after the search warrant was executed in May.
I understand a lot of people take DAs at face value sometimes, but they are prone to mistakes and bias(especially around election times) as well and there's a lot of waiting we'll have to do as more info comes out.
Edit: Ok, so the tampering is from falsifying the account to conceal wrongdoing
Last edited: