ISU Gambling Megathread

clonedude

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
33,032
29,268
113

This might be telling

I’m fully prepared for his suspension to get reduced from all season to just one game, and he’ll be back for the ISU game.
 
  • Funny
  • Like
Reactions: MJ29 and NWICY

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,134
7,734
113
Dubuque
Interesting quote in there...

"A source with direct knowledge of the situation also told The Des Moines Register that quarterback Hunter Dekkers and tight end DeShawn Hanika haven’t yet started practice."

Did I miss something, or is there any expectation they ever will?
Feel like guys practicing vs leaving team is based on NCAA enforcement actions. Remsburg is practicing because NCAA has determined his penalty less than full season. While we had Lee and Brock leave team because NCAA punishment was permanent ban.

Could be the NCAA hasn't made ruling or responded to appeal on Dekkers and Hanika. And ISU isn't going to let them practice until NCAA finalizes penalty.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Statefan10

Clark

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2009
18,434
4,696
113
Altoona
Reading between the lines, it appears Shannon lost a full season for betting on an Iowa WBB game. Punishment doesn't seem to fit the crime but I doubt Iowa will win the appeal.

From the sounds of it, kirk mentioned that two others were facing suspension of varying lengths, probably won't know who until next Saturday.
 

Cyched

CF Influencer
May 8, 2009
38,369
66,341
113
Colorado
Since it’s week zero should update the title to: “***OFFICIAL Iowa State vs Gambling Game(day) Thread***”
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,486
25,934
113


He's spot on. If it's a serious enough infraction that you justify suspending someone a year, or even eliminating their eligibility all together, then I'd expect the NCAA to be coordinating with sportsbook and law enforcement all over the country to investigate. But instead they are only picking it up because we happen to live in a state where the DCI is apparently underworked enough they need to investigate petty, victimless crimes.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: clonedude

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,771
13,411
113
He's spot on. If it's a serious enough infraction that you justify suspending someone a year, or even eliminating their eligibility all together, then I'd expect the NCAA to be coordinating with sportsbook and law enforcement all over the country to investigate. But instead they are only picking it up because we happen to live in a state where the DCI is apparently underworked enough they need to investigate petty, victimless crimes.
Yes, and the NCAA knows who scratches its back.
 

clonedude

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
33,032
29,268
113
Hey…. how about we also just drug test the athletes at Iowa and ISU too!

This whole thing is a farce. A huge disadvantage for Iowa and ISU.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: isufbcurt