Iowa State Uniform Discussions (update: new basketball unis)

CyGuy5

Well-Known Member
Dec 4, 2013
7,881
10,201
113
Kansas City
My one takeaway is that we’re still on the old Nike template. I assume that should come next year along with a possible refresh
 

byebye

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2021
641
845
93
My one takeaway is that we’re still on the old Nike template. I assume that should come next year along with a possible refresh
Maybe next year - although this template has been around for a while, it's only widely available this year - frankly, I prefer the Untouchable template, specifically the collar & less seams including no seams on the front

Here's a look at the, side-by-side:

 

bgprest

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2008
907
594
93
Dallas, TX
Wow! The uniform thread has drifted three pages back on the forums list.

About time to re-awaken it with what the uniforms for the Cy-Hawk game are going to be?...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Willow 2 13th

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
21,190
27,213
113
Wow! The uniform thread has drifted three pages back on the forums list.

About time to re-awaken it with what the uniforms for the Cy-Hawk game are going to be?...
White helmet w/ cardinal facemask
Cardinal jersey
White pants
 
  • Like
Reactions: bgprest

CRCy17

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
1,350
1,009
113
38
Chicago, IL
One thing I really don't like as someone who only gets to watch from home, and the quality of ESPN+ doesn't help, but the numbers font is really annoying as some numbers can easily be confused for one another, especially if a jersey bunches up. The way the tail of the 5 comes almost all the way up makes it look like a 6 at times. I know I should be able to tell Sanders and Norton apart by their body type, but it is hard to tell on tv, especially early in the season when they are rotating in so frequently. Is this just a me problem, or do others feel the same way?

Sanders Norton.png

running-back-cartevious-norton-of-the-iowa-state-cyclones-rushes-for-yards-in-the-first-half.jpg
 

SolarGarlic

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,315
9,629
113
One thing I really don't like as someone who only gets to watch from home, and the quality of ESPN+ doesn't help, but the numbers font is really annoying as some numbers can easily be confused for one another, especially if a jersey bunches up. The way the tail of the 5 comes almost all the way up makes it look like a 6 at times. I know I should be able to tell Sanders and Norton apart by their body type, but it is hard to tell on tv, especially early in the season when they are rotating in so frequently. Is this just a me problem, or do others feel the same way?

View attachment 116452

running-back-cartevious-norton-of-the-iowa-state-cyclones-rushes-for-yards-in-the-first-half.jpg
There is some confusion for me on the DL because they are the most likely to have their jerseys bunch up. But I mostly just think the number font is ugly. Too big, too busy.
 

theshadow

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2006
20,002
19,679
113
One thing I really don't like as someone who only gets to watch from home, and the quality of ESPN+ doesn't help, but the numbers font is really annoying as some numbers can easily be confused for one another, especially if a jersey bunches up. The way the tail of the 5 comes almost all the way up makes it look like a 6 at times.

It's not much better in person.

But it's been that way in multiple uniform sets. The 2003-07 Nike jerseys were almost impossible to differentiate 0, 3, 6, 8, and 9 if the jersey shifted even a little.

If you didn't know that Nik Moser wore #9, you might think he was wearing #8 here:

defensive-back-nik-moser-of-the-iowa-state-cyclones-strips-the-ball-away-from-scott-chandler.jpg



Cris Love? That's #16 (not #18):

4cf1ff4d-a6c6-5936-8dbe-26992f2576b8.image.jpg




The main problems with the current sets are the narrow gaps (such as the 5) and the stylized interior of the numbers. For example, the design of the 8 almost makes it looks like a 9, given the small gap in the 9. See Kolar and Soehner:

5fc6ead31f5d6.image.jpg
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CRCy17

BMWallace

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
Sep 11, 2011
1,538
2,921
113
Chicago, IL
It's not much better in person.

But it's been that way in multiple uniform sets. The 2003-07 Nike jerseys were almost impossible to differentiate 0, 3, 6, 8, and 9 if the jersey shifted even a little.

If you didn't know that Nik Moser wore #9, you might think he was wearing #8 here:

defensive-back-nik-moser-of-the-iowa-state-cyclones-strips-the-ball-away-from-scott-chandler.jpg



Cris Love? That's #16 (not #18):

4cf1ff4d-a6c6-5936-8dbe-26992f2576b8.image.jpg




The main problems with the current sets are the narrow gaps (such as the 5) and the stylized interior of the numbers. For example, the design of the 8 almost makes it looks like a 9, given the small gap in the 9. See Kolar and Soehner:

5fc6ead31f5d6.image.jpg
I am fairly certain that some coaches like that the numbers can be harder to read. Set up position groups with similar looking numbers so that opposing teams have a harder time immediately recognizing personel and packages. Just a bit of gamesmanship.