*** Official Oklahoma State vs IOWA STATE Game(Day) Thread ***

Letterkenny

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 26, 2023
1,787
3,625
113
I'm guessing a snow plow escort from Des Moines to Ames is not out of the question. They usually get a police escort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Erik4Cy

NENick

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
2,567
4,287
113
Since ESPN announcers couldn't make it to Ames and the game is moved to +, let's go no announcers! Otherwise it's going to be 2 interns calling the game remotely.

If they play the game at all, that is.
 

CapnCy

Well-Known Member
Jul 6, 2010
6,204
3,071
113
Since ESPN announcers couldn't make it to Ames and the game is moved to +, let's go no announcers! Otherwise it's going to be 2 interns calling the game remotely.

If they play the game at all, that is.
Wish they could just use John and Eric. I know the radio has commercial obligations to say/do, but someone could just have them only during game action.
 

jdubs

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 5, 2011
1,916
2,161
113
Since ESPN announcers couldn't make it to Ames and the game is moved to +, let's go no announcers! Otherwise it's going to be 2 interns calling the game remotely.

If they play the game at all, that is.
It's very likely to be ESPN announcers calling it from Bristol or Chicago. ESPN does a lot of remote broadcasts and just doesn't tell viewers.
 

rosshm16

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 8, 2023
5,190
8,471
113
Baylor can get away with the push, we can't. Let's keep that in the old memory banks.
Wrong thread, but that series was bad enough I think it deserves mention in this thread too.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jdubs

KidSilverhair

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2010
11,080
21,757
113
Rapids of the Cedar
www.kegofglory.blogspot.com
The Ames runway is 5700 feet long. A google search indicated that a 737 needs a 6000 foot runway.
Hence my statement “on the ground.” Blowing out the brakes to avoid running off the end of the runway into the snow by the Danfoss warehouse would still be “landing,” by some definition … but they’d have a very hard time getting that plane back up in the air from there.

Theres also this, from Boeing’s own 2005 publication about B737s for airport planners (I do realize different models of 737s have different runway requirements):

IMG_3914.jpeg

(It was a joke, son)
 
Last edited:

aeroclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
10,369
7,189
113
Hence my statement “on the ground.” Blowing out the brakes to avoid running off the end of the runway into the snow by the Danfoss warehouse would still be “landing,” by some definition … but they’d have a very hard time getting that plane back up in the air from there.

Something something any landing you can walk away from something something.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,540
74,331
113
Ankeny
Hence my statement “on the ground.” Blowing out the brakes to avoid running off the end of the runway into the snow by the Danfoss warehouse would still be “landing,” by some definition … but they’d have a very hard time getting that plane back up in the air from there.

Theres also this, from Boeing’s own 2005 publication about B737s for airport planners (I do realize different models of 737s have different runway requirements):

View attachment 122141

(It was a joke, son)

That being said, aren't runway requirements typically more about being able to take off than being able to land? I imagine a 737 may be able to land at Ames airport just fine given the length requirement is pretty close, but taking off is where the issue would potentially arise (though a lightly loaded charter plane might be easier from that end too)
 
  • Like
Reactions: riceville98

rosshm16

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 8, 2023
5,190
8,471
113
CW said on Twitter that as of an hour ago ISU said we're still planning on playing today.

Can't play without an opponent in the building though.
 

KidSilverhair

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2010
11,080
21,757
113
Rapids of the Cedar
www.kegofglory.blogspot.com
That being said, aren't runway requirements typically more about being able to take off than being able to land? I imagine a 737 may be able to land at Ames airport just fine given the length requirement is pretty close, but taking off is where the issue would potentially arise (though a lightly loaded charter plane might be easier from that end too)
Well, you do need both a takeoff and a landing to actually use an airport … just one doesn’t work so well.
 
  • Haha
  • Funny
Reactions: aauummm and CYDJ

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,540
74,331
113
Ankeny
Well, you do need both a takeoff and a landing to actually use an airport … just one doesn’t work so well.

For sure, I'm just saying it wouldn't necessarily be because the plane would have all that much worry about landing safely without damage.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron