That's been covered. They can't land a 737 in ames.
Wish they could just use John and Eric. I know the radio has commercial obligations to say/do, but someone could just have them only during game action.Since ESPN announcers couldn't make it to Ames and the game is moved to +, let's go no announcers! Otherwise it's going to be 2 interns calling the game remotely.
If they play the game at all, that is.
It's very likely to be ESPN announcers calling it from Bristol or Chicago. ESPN does a lot of remote broadcasts and just doesn't tell viewers.Since ESPN announcers couldn't make it to Ames and the game is moved to +, let's go no announcers! Otherwise it's going to be 2 interns calling the game remotely.
If they play the game at all, that is.
And what you missed when you were typing was "KU".The keyword you missed was "typically".
The Ames runway is 5700 feet long. A google search indicated that a 737 needs a 6000 foot runway.Sure they can. I guarantee they could get a 737 on the ground in Ames. Having it in a condition to take back off again, well, that’s the trick.
New flight appears to be a CRJ into DSM still.The Ames runway is 5700 feet long. A google search indicated that a 737 needs a 6000 foot runway.
Wrong thread, but that series was bad enough I think it deserves mention in this thread too.Baylor can get away with the push, we can't. Let's keep that in the old memory banks.
The Ames runway is 5700 feet long. A google search indicated that a 737 needs a 6000 foot runway.
Hence my statement “on the ground.” Blowing out the brakes to avoid running off the end of the runway into the snow by the Danfoss warehouse would still be “landing,” by some definition … but they’d have a very hard time getting that plane back up in the air from there.The Ames runway is 5700 feet long. A google search indicated that a 737 needs a 6000 foot runway.
Hence my statement “on the ground.” Blowing out the brakes to avoid running off the end of the runway into the snow by the Danfoss warehouse would still be “landing,” by some definition … but they’d have a very hard time getting that plane back up in the air from there.
The Ames runway is 5700 feet long. A google search indicated that a 737 needs a 6000 foot runway.
Hence my statement “on the ground.” Blowing out the brakes to avoid running off the end of the runway into the snow by the Danfoss warehouse would still be “landing,” by some definition … but they’d have a very hard time getting that plane back up in the air from there.
Theres also this, from Boeing’s own 2005 publication about B737s for airport planners (I do realize different models of 737s have different runway requirements):
View attachment 122141
(It was a joke, son)
Well, you do need both a takeoff and a landing to actually use an airport … just one doesn’t work so well.That being said, aren't runway requirements typically more about being able to take off than being able to land? I imagine a 737 may be able to land at Ames airport just fine given the length requirement is pretty close, but taking off is where the issue would potentially arise (though a lightly loaded charter plane might be easier from that end too)
Well, you do need both a takeoff and a landing to actually use an airport … just one doesn’t work so well.