We are standing up for our conference. What are you doing here?In the past 20 years they have more individual teams with national championships than the Big 12 has appearances. What’re we doing here?
You may have an argument that the Big and SEC deserve more due to past accomplishments, and that is a point in your favor, yes. But stacking the deck favoring those two conferences in the future, to the tune of 2 to 3 times greater revenue, and more teams in any playoff, regardless of simply wins/losses is not entirely fair either.
In an alternate universe there could have been greater revenue given to the Packers, Cowboys, Giants, Steelers, Redskins, 49ers, in the NFL, because they were the better teams, in years past. There would be no revenue sharing The better, more historically sound teams would not have a salary cap. The lesser teams would habitually struggle on an annual basis to stay relevant.
But in the NFL, that didn't happen, and there is revenue and profit sharing. There are salary cap rules that apply to all. Each year the lower teams have a chance to move up in the draft order. Things are built for parity. And guess what, the NFL is doing very well, thank you.
Standing up for the SEC and B1G is not popular here, right or wrong (it is wrong), and has no benefit to the whole of college football or college sports.