I used it to write my most recent resume and cover letter. I fine tuned it a bit myself, but the heavy lifting was done by the bots. Saved a ton of time (cranked both out in abotu 15 minutes) and got the job.
If I was your manager and found this out, you wouldn’t have the job longI used it to write my most recent resume and cover letter. I fine tuned it a bit myself, but the heavy lifting was done by the bots. Saved a ton of time (cranked both out in abotu 15 minutes) and got the job.
It's not as effective and still "hallucinates" or gives BS answers.
I've found that students who use it a lot struggle with deeper critical thinking.
Maybe that will change, but the amount of natural resources it consumes to power these programs troubles me.
Not really, though I will look at the AI answer on a Google search before digging any deeper (particularly if it's an easy question).
Why though? As a manager, I’d hope the resume isn’t the sole reason you hire someone. If it is, that’s a pretty lazy hiring method. You certainly aren’t going to fire someone due to a resume either, are you?If I was your manager and found this out, you wouldn’t have the job long
As a hiring manager. Which I am. I would never hire someone who took a short cut. It says more about their work effort than anything. Call me old school. That’s fine. But young adults out there looking for jobs need to know that us “old farts”Why though? As a manager, I’d hope the resume isn’t the sole reason you hire someone. If it is, that’s a pretty lazy hiring method. You certainly aren’t going to fire someone due to a resume either, are you?
The resume just gets a person in the door. There is still an in person interview, no? AI can’t perform that for the applicant. You, as a manager, should be able to cut through any ******** during that meeting. Once hired, performance is all you as a manager should care about.
If I was your manager and found this out, you wouldn’t have the job long
As a hiring manager. Which I am. I would never hire someone who took a short cut. It says more about their work effort than anything. Call me old school. That’s fine. But young adults out there looking for jobs need to know that us “old farts”
are actually taking these things into account when hiring.
But you said “If I was your manager and found this out, you wouldn’t have the job long”.As a hiring manager. Which I am. I would never hire someone who took a short cut. It says more about their work effort than anything. Call me old school. That’s fine. But young adults out there looking for jobs need to know that us “old farts”
are actually taking these things into account when hiring.
It has nothing to do about evolving. If I’m hiring someone, I want to know they can think and express on their own. If they can’t even write their own resume, it tells me they can’t perform the job I’m asking them to doTime to evolve. It'd be one thing if it fabricated facts out of thin air - which it sometimes does, and users obviously need to monitor the output - but it saves a lot of white-collar grunt work.
I've been going through some health stuff lately and it's great for taking raw medical reports and having it broken down into more accessible language.
Oh and playlists and other completely unnecessary fun stuff too.
I would have a lower opinion of your ability to perform the job without help. That would put you at the bottom of the pile when things get rough. Of course, your actually performance could and should prevail.But you said “If I was your manager and found this out, your wouldn’t have the job long”.
Doesn’t than imply the job was already secured and now your using the fact that someone used AI to assist in putting together a resume as a reason to terminate?
You're in the resume writing business?It has nothing to do about evolving. If I’m hiring someone, I want to know they can think and express on their own. If they can’t even write their own resume, it tells me they can’t perform the job I’m asking them to do n
I probably interact with it more than I know.
Frankly it scares the **** out of me. My company/industry is diving in head first.
The AI brings up the performance of the lower half of employees. It'll be fun when the bottom feeders are getting the same production scores as the better workers.
It has the potential to dull the need for humans to actually learn or create.
The technology is introducing a new wave of fraud that we cannot detect.
It honestly makes me concerned for humanity. Ted Kaczynski was an evil man, but he wasn't completely wrong.
But the AI promoters will piss on our leg and tell us it's raining. It'll create NEW jobs. Sure. New jobs that AI will perform.
In a nutshell....I'm not optimistic
It has nothing to do about evolving. If I’m hiring someone, I want to know they can think and express on their own. If they can’t even write their own resume, it tells me they can’t perform the job I’m asking them to do n
I’m in the resume reading business. Just forewarning y’all. Be careful. Hiring managers aren’t stupid and can pick out pretty easily if you didn’t actually write your own resume. It’s pretty obvious after about 10 minutes on a phone interview.You're in the resume writing business?