This. He has not been great for much of the season but his leadership, intangibles and calmness are huge factors for this time.He threw a terrible pass - rifled it from 10 feet away a yard behind the target. Its ok to say so.
And if Noel doesnt tip it, it probably goes right into the turf and no one cares.
He had several bad throws. An out that was almost picked. A few behind recievers. Underthrew Higgins on a long completion that could have been a TD.
He also threw some dimes. Didnt get down or go in the tank when he screwed up. Led them downfield for the game winning score.
He certainly hasnt been perfect but he has been good enough to get them to 9-2
Pure talent wise? Moberly is probably the most purely gifted QB in that room. He's taller, so in theory, can see easier and less deflected at the LOS. He's a little more fluid in the hips, so in theory, again, can be more a true dual threat and the ball seems a little more lively coming out of his hand.
That said, there is so much more to playing QB than just talent. And all of that is where Rocco excels. Somewhat similar to Purdy. Leadership, calmness, poise, intelligence, etc... it gets such a bad rap but he's a game manager and that really should not be an insult. He's more than good enough to help you win - and help you be 9-2. In other words, he's a high floor but not high ceiling IMO.
Rocco's a huge reason why we are 9-2. He's also a big reason why we struggled last night but then again, he's also a reason why we had the game winning drive. He's neither as good nor as bad as some think. He's ... a solid college QB.