I hate unbalanced schedules.. I know nothing can be done.Yes. Goes to tiebreaker over 2 seed which is tech. Arizona gets it over byu because they went 1-1. BYU went 0-1.
I hate unbalanced schedules.. I know nothing can be done.Yes. Goes to tiebreaker over 2 seed which is tech. Arizona gets it over byu because they went 1-1. BYU went 0-1.
I'm not a basketball guy, but surely he's not drawing up plays where guys make bad/lazy passes, don't catch the ball, loose their dribble, etc. I mean it's not ALL on the offensive coaches.He. Draws. Up. Our. Offensive. Plays.
All of them. Watch the huddle in a timeout. TJ stands back and observes. Schmidt has full control in those draw ups
I'm not a basketball guy, but surely he's not drawing up plays where guys make bad/lazy passes, don't catch the ball, loose their dribble, etc. I mean it's not ALL on the offensive coaches.
Keshon had an opportunity to either drive or shoot on the last play, instead he hesitated until he was covered and threw it to Momcilovic in the corner with 2 seconds left.
Yes, it’s easy to think the Big 12 is the whole world. I fall into that thinking often. But, for example, conf. teams have learned how to guard Jones. Undoubtedly, tournament teams will study this, but will they be able to consistently execute the strategy, as well as execute the strategies to contain Momcilovic, Gilbert, Lipsey,…? And even if they defend the Jones pick and roll well, will the help defense be late rotating and leave the roller open? Will someone sag too far off a shooter, allowing ISU to swing it? I’m NOT saying tournament games are a cakewalk just because the Big 12 has a lot of good coaches. But there’s a reason many games are back and forth towards the end. It’s just difficult to defend for 40:00 against a team you’ve likely not played. ISU’s offense should benefit from that reality, and its defense is more up to the task than many teams’Otz's first team made it to the sweet 16 and that team was a 1 trick pony.
Honestly the tourney is about match ups, and in the case of ISU, if they get to the round of 32, teams don't get to practice or prepare for the ISU trap. That is where ISU makes its hay.
Based on their efficiency numbers still think they will get to another sweet 16..
Just seems like this team has such a high variance in the NCAA Tournament. Potential is there to make a deep run. Could also easily see a Hampton/UAB type loss in the opener.Otz's first team made it to the sweet 16 and that team was a 1 trick pony.
Honestly the tourney is about match ups, and in the case of ISU, if they get to the round of 32, teams don't get to practice or prepare for the ISU trap. That is where ISU makes its hay.
Based on their efficiency numbers still think they will get to another sweet 16..
I get what you're saying, but it's not like these guys have a 500 play McDermott play book. At times we just fail to execute basic basketball skills.You’ve got to call the plays the team is capable of.
Yep. So not calling it already. And also total wins and losses straight up is a pretty crappy metric to determine what team is better when it's close... especially wheb there's no round robin. We didnt go to phogg last year, for example. Look at torvik or kenpom numbers. It's not even close.Ok, well unless we win the Big 12 tournament and National Championship we will end up with more losses than last year.
They still play very good defense. I think lowers the chances of tripping up. But its the NCAA tourney and a team gets hot from 3 it can end suddenlyJust seems like this team has such a high variance in the NCAA Tournament. Potential is there to make a deep run. Could also easily see a Hampton/UAB type loss in the opener.
Otz's first team made it to the sweet 16 and that team was a 1 trick pony.
Honestly the tourney is about match ups, and in the case of ISU, if they get to the round of 32, teams don't get to practice or prepare for the ISU trap. That is where ISU makes its hay.
Based on their efficiency numbers still think they will get to another sweet 16..
Yep. The guys you mentioned really battled. Heise as well aside from his slowing up on that steal and what should've been a roof raising dunk. We didn't play particularly well overall and still erased a 21 pt deficit in the 2nd half.Just a big loss tonight in so many ways. Really tips the scales the wrong direction in seeding for KC and the Tourney. No warm fuzzies going on right now.
I will tell you this though. We are so damn lucky to have TJ as our coach, and these warriors like Tamin, Keshon, Curtis on our side. This team just doesn't seem to have that "it" factor, but tonight at least shows us that these guys will never give up and will battle til the end. If they can just make it to that second weekend......I hope.....anything can happen then.
You’ve got to call the plays the team is capable of.
I’m upset too but it’s clear we have a lot of fans that need a hobby.
Yep. The guys you mentioned really battled. Heise as well aside from his slowing up on that steal and what should've been a roof raising dunk. We didn't play particularly well overall and still erased a 21 pt deficit in the 2nd half.
I'm looking at this one as a total mixed bag of positives and negatives.
Positives: KG, & CuJo looked a lot better. I don't think either is back to 100%, but I'm hopeful with another couple of weeks before the Tourney, they'll be close to getting their mojo completely back. Tamin, Milan, Heise and JJ all hit big shots in the 2nd half after a pretty dreadful 1st. Defense was elite until we were obviously gassed in OT. We forced a ton of turnovers and that will usually win the game for us, but not tonight. Our turnovers were also down from what they've been.
Negatives: We got destroyed on the glass, and our bigs were invisible and did pretty much nothing. That really killed us. Our offense was too tentative in the 1st half with guys standing around waiting for someone else to make a play. No one seemed to want to be aggressive. Obviously poor shooting overall didn't help us either. And even though as I mentioned above, we committed fewer turnovers, we also had a few that really killed us late in regulation and the OT's.
Nooo! I said they would go 16/18! HahahaYou said they'd miss free throws!!!
Having a hard time remembering a stranger Iowa State team. We are just so variable from game to game.
The team has no identity on offense. Last year was "Tamin's team", he wasn't the leading scorer but he was running the show. This year he's not handling the ball and running the offense nearly as much, he's playing this off-the-ball / combo-guard role a lot more. Maybe it's because of the injuries he's dealing with. I've stopped trying to understand what we're doing on offense. Every shot we get just seems really difficult.
The defensive intensity in this game was great but we haven't seen that effort consistently this year.