I think you guys are misunderstanding my post. The post I responded to literally said he'd be pissed if he didn't play as a freshman because it's wasting a whole year.
I'm sorry but that's the definition of entitlement, There are only so many minutes, innings, downs, whatever else available in collegiate sports, not everyone gets to participate.
There's nothing wrong with being a 4-star recruit who plays on the Lithuanian national team and believing you're good enough to be playing.
Entitled is sulking on the bench. Or the people who essentially sit out in protest until their outrageous NIL demands are met.
This is no different from an adult working at a job, seeing their leadership go in a different direction for a promotion, and deciding that it's a sign that their talents are better aligned elsewhere.
I'd never want to see a college athlete acting with an overinflated ego. But they don't owe anyone unending commitment. They should act like professionals, never burn bridges, and make decisions that will benefit them long-term.
No one is going to look back on this when they're 80 and say "well, I sat on the bench and cheered one team on when I know I could have contributed somewhere else...but at least the fans on the message board were happy.
(And, were the fans happy? It goes both ways- if fans expect players to be 100% committed, no matter what, they should do the same. Look at the abuse some of these players have to take from their own fan bases. Some of these expectations are out of control.)