That specific subject was not broached.I'd only listen to this if he admitted to being totally off-base with his accusation of there being a spy in Hilton.
Well, it should have been; it's the elephant in the room, after all. He should have broached the topic himself, if the interviewers were too polite to do so.That specific subject was not broached.
I won't listen to it if he wasn't confronted about his behavior toward TJ and the program. He falsely accused the program of cheating in a most ridiculous manner, and his assistants were witnessed unfairly berating students working at the game. Unless he plans to apologize and address his behavior, I wouldn't have him as a guest on an ISU podcast.That specific subject was not broached.
He is not. Trust me.This is really unfortunate for my narratives. It appears Tang is a good guy
It's going to take a loooooong time for me to give Tang the benefit of the doubt after his ridiculous accusations.
Still a total goober, but that was a good interview.
Comes across like a lot of coaches. Seems to be a good guy off the court, but goes insane in the heat of battle.
This is really unfortunate for my narratives. It appears Tang is a good guy
As I pondered a little more, even though spygate seems somewhat water-under-bridge by now, it does seem odd that you'd make effort get Tang for an interview, and not attempt to address it.
It's a "then what's the point?" type of thing. Not that it has to be the SOLE focus or topic, by any means. Could shove it toward the end of the discussion and even keep it somewhat lighthearted in your approach.
At least give him opportunity to respond. Worst that could happen is he evades it or chooses not to comment.
Now I'm trying to recall, was there some kind of informal agreement to land the interview that the topic was off-limits? Pod guys said some things the 'cast prior to the segment, now I don't remember specifics.
Regarding "Spygate," I think KIckin' It team mentioned where they decided to go and "not go," prior to the Tang segment. I'm not going to defend that decision or go out of my way to criticize it.
An unrelated question they asked, about the rebuild at Baylor after the scandal, he didn't answer directly how difficult it was. (That was the question). The answer he gave was OK, but I wanted to know how much of an uphill climb it was.
If the Tang is speaking to you, I don't think the NASA psychiatrists will let you fly...I think you should only listen to Tang if you want to be an astronaut.