Gotta be unless someone fell in the shower again.This was my first thought but I guess we'll see.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gotta be unless someone fell in the shower again.This was my first thought but I guess we'll see.
Eh, one year sample after being awful for a long time is nothing but noise in defensive metrics.
It was just a pipe dream of mine to add him so I’m sure it isn’t happening. But I find it pretty funny that posters will make **** up just to disagree with me.
And strikes out around once a month. He's a stud.His slug is above league average and his walk rate is around 6% meaning he walks around once a week less than league average.
Detmers is a top of the rotation guy? Maybe given our current rotation injuries he would be but he's probably more like a 3 at best. I do like the multiple years of control aspect though. I'd rather have Soriano to be honest as we already have 2 LHP in the rotation with Shota and Boyd and technically a 3rd in Peterson right now too plus I think Soriano has a bit more upside. Soriano also throws a harder fastball which is something we could use to offset our softer tossing guys. Both have multiple years of control left which makes me thinks the Angels asking price is going to be quite a bit. Either would be a nice addition that also fills a rotation need for next season too.Alright where are we going to go in the next 10 days?
I'd love Detmers - gives you a clear top of the rotation arm for cheap for the next 3 years. I'd be comfortable starting him in a playoff game.
Holmes has the exact makeup that Zombro loves and is a rental so I doubt he'd break the bank. Wouldn't mind getting him in and then seeing if he's a guy we re-sign in FA.
I saw an article yesterday saying we have exactly what the Angels are coveting for their starting pitching ( Ayers ). If we can land Deters or even Soriano for him and get two more years of control that’s a no brainer.Alright where are we going to go in the next 10 days?
I'd love Detmers - gives you a clear top of the rotation arm for cheap for the next 3 years. I'd be comfortable starting him in a playoff game.
Holmes has the exact makeup that Zombro loves and is a rental so I doubt he'd break the bank. Wouldn't mind getting him in and then seeing if he's a guy we re-sign in FA.
I agree, Ayers is rising through the minors quickly but it's still probably a stretch that he could be ready to contribute at some point in Chicago next year given how you still have to develop him behind the plate defensively too. He just got promoted to AAA recently but he started the year in A+ so he probably could use a full season in AAA. And as we have discussed here you can't just hold onto all your prospects with the worry that you may trade away a guy that turns into a stud as we have seen that play out many times the past 5-10 years and the guys we held onto haven't really panned out so we missed out on cashing in on some prospect capital for guys that might of helped us make a push in that moment.I saw an article yesterday saying we have exactly what the Angels are coveting for their starting pitching ( Ayers ). If we can land Deters or even Soriano for him and get two more years of control that’s a no brainer.
Canario was another one like Alcantara, was absolutely mashing AAA hitting at times then when we called him up much like Alcantara we barely played him and destroyed his trade value. Time will tell if Caissie pans out but probably traded him a year too late as well. If these guys don't have paths to get a shot at being a full-time player in Chicago in the near future, I don't know why Jed hesitates so much to move them in a trade that could help us in the present.Jed waiting too long on Caissie and repeated the mistake with Alcantara. Got way less than he could have before Caissie got to AAA and destroyed Alcantara's value.
I think you're at the same point with Wiggins. Trade him now before the elbow blows up again or people start to really look at that walk rate.
He's got all these infield prospects when the only path to playing time in the next 4 years is a corner outfield spot and none of them have the slug, except for possibly Shaw, to work there.Canario was another one like Alcantara, was absolutely mashing AAA hitting at times then when we called him up much like Alcantara we barely played him and destroyed his trade value. Time will tell if Caissie pans out but probably traded him a year too late as well. If these guys don't have paths to get a shot at being a full-time player in Chicago in the near future, I don't know why Jed hesitates so much to move them in a trade that could help us in the present.
I would have been perfectly fine if Jed thought one of these guys were the future at a position, then cleared out the path for a prospect to start every day and then they flopped. At least then we made the commitment that we felt that guy was a prospect we could not afford to lose but wound up being wrong on it. I'd rather someone else be the one that was wrong but can't have this mentality that every prospect we may trade is going to blow up and be a star because there usually are more misses than hits when it comes to prospects - or at least with the Cubs it seems that way.
This is why I was pissed with what they did last year at the deadline? They hoard their prospects that are in AAA. They know you can’t play everyone and most will flop so why hold. There was no reason for the Jonathon Long Triantos types to still be in the org last year. Flip them for a relieverCanario was another one like Alcantara, was absolutely mashing AAA hitting at times then when we called him up much like Alcantara we barely played him and destroyed his trade value. Time will tell if Caissie pans out but probably traded him a year too late as well. If these guys don't have paths to get a shot at being a full-time player in Chicago in the near future, I don't know why Jed hesitates so much to move them in a trade that could help us in the present.
I would have been perfectly fine if Jed thought one of these guys were the future at a position, then cleared out the path for a prospect to start every day and then they flopped. At least then we made the commitment that we felt that guy was a prospect we could not afford to lose but wound up being wrong on it. I'd rather someone else be the one that was wrong but can't have this mentality that every prospect we may trade is going to blow up and be a star because there usually are more misses than hits when it comes to prospects - or at least with the Cubs it seems that way.