Driving rant: PLEASE stop this!!

Seems pretty clear that time of arrival doesn’t matter as it’s never mentioned.


View attachment 172125
It's mentioned elsewhere and says first arriving goes first with no mention of turning or going strait. This assumes simultaneous. Gives way to different interpretations.

I got my first taste of traffic circles in Riyhad Saudia Arabia. What you learned there is to never make eye contact with other drivers or you would be expected to get out of the way.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: BACyclone and Cycsk
It's mentioned elsewhere and says first arriving goes first with no mention of turning or going strait. This assumes simultaneous. Gives way to different interpretations.

I got my first taste of traffic circles in Riyhad Saudia Arabia. What you learned there is to never make eye contact with other drivers or you would be expected to get out of the way.
First arrival at a four way stop sign intersection? Everything I’ve found says that right of way has priority for every other situation.
 
So what happens if another car also going straight pulls up behind that vehicle going straight etc. Do they all go first? The real rules only will matter in court. I would allow the car arriving first to go first, but in either case proceed cautiously and watch other driver. Nothing I hate more than two tentative drivers at an impasse.
No, they're all pulling up to stop signs. So there's vehicle #1 at their stop sign that intends to go straight through the intersection, and vehicle #1 at their stop sign that intends to turn left. Vehicle #1 going straight passes through the intersection, meanwhile vehicle #1 turning left slowly enters the intersection, waits for the car going straight to pass through, and then makes their turn. Then vehicles #2 do their thing.
 
Love them - they're so much better than stoplights and stop signs. Biggest issue is people who don't know how to ******* drive through them.

I think its a combo

There are many who don't know how to drive through them. But there are also many that are poorly designed. Especially when you start going beyond one-lane roundabouts to where it can be difficult to tell whether a car is exiting or continuing on around the circle, which causes people to be stopping anyway, and the rules for 2 lane roundabouts can be inconsistent
 

I do that as a courtesy if someone is coming up behind me. I also pull over even if there's only a relatively short gap before the next vehicle ahead I want to pass. I would hope people would notice that courtesy and kind of speed up to get past me so I could come back over and pass the next vehicle. But most are so unaware they just camp there in the left lane and you end up slowing way down because they won't get past to let you in.
I tend to have a bit of a lead foot and I genuinely appreciate those who are alert and move back into the right lane when they can. I will generally (where possible) momentarily speed up a bit to prevent the kind fellow motorist from having to slow down after yielding the passing lane to me.

I really despise those who just drive in the left lane when not passing. They are called the driving lane and the passing lane for a reason. Everyone forgets to move back over once in a while, that's okay. When you find somone coming up behind you signal and get back into the driving lane. But some people seem to think that the passing lane is actually their own personal lane. They set the cruise at 2 mph under the limit and pull out a book to read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MeanDean
I have mentioned this before in other threads, but I live about a block from the first roundabout in the entire state of Minnesota. In my over 20 years living here and averaging multiple transits of that baby a day I have had to come to a complete stop probably only a handful of times a year. I would have been stopping and starting every single time if it was a 4 way stop, and stopping and waiting even longer half of the time if it were a traffic signal. It has probably saved me hours of my time and gallons upon gallons of fuel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BACyclone
I have mentioned this before in other threads, but I live about a block from the first roundabout in the entire state of Minnesota. In my over 20 years living here and averaging multiple transits of that baby a day I have had to come to a complete stop probably only a handful of times a year. I would have been stopping and starting every single time if it was a 4 way stop, and stopping and waiting even longer half of the time if it were a traffic signal. It has probably saved me hours of my time and gallons upon gallons of fuel.
True in some cases, especially replacing 4 ways, but well-timed lights can be better. That is lights that allow the main throughway to hit green at every light if following the speed limit. It's one of the best ways to limit speeding. About two years ago, I drove University in Cedar Falls for the first time in over 20 years. All the roundabouts on that are annoying.
 
In most situations they are great.

My only hesitation is how many people are utterly clueless in how to use them safely.
Most of the ones I see in Iowa are one lane. Billings, MT uses 2 lane ones everywhere and after I got used to it I was hooked. As far as the one lane ones go it basically the same principle as a 4-way stop imo. Its pretty simple who gets there first has the right of way. I kind of feel like people look at me crazy because I use my turn signals at them. Id be all about Iowa using reflectors in cities to divide traffic like Seattle does. Im getting old here and at night when its raining im as bad as a drunk driver when I cant see the lines.
 
Most of the ones I see in Iowa are one lane. Billings, MT uses 2 lane ones everywhere and after I got used to it I was hooked. As far as the one lane ones go it basically the same principle as a 4-way stop imo. Its pretty simple who gets there first has the right of way. I kind of feel like people look at me crazy because I use my turn signals at them. Id be all about Iowa using reflectors in cities to divide traffic like Seattle does. Im getting old here and at night when its raining im as bad as a drunk driver when I cant see the lines.
They can't put reflectors in the lanes because the snow plows would destroy them during winter. They are all over in warmer climates and they do help at night.
 
Most of the ones I see in Iowa are one lane. Billings, MT uses 2 lane ones everywhere and after I got used to it I was hooked. As far as the one lane ones go it basically the same principle as a 4-way stop imo. Its pretty simple who gets there first has the right of way. I kind of feel like people look at me crazy because I use my turn signals at them. Id be all about Iowa using reflectors in cities to divide traffic like Seattle does. Im getting old here and at night when its raining im as bad as a drunk driver when I cant see the lines.
In Marion, there are two 2 lane roundabouts on the same road about 2 miles from each. It infuriates me due to their inconsistency. On the one roundabout, the inside lane goes straight and the outside lane turns. One the other roundabout it's exactly the opposite. It's hard enough to get people to use them correctly, but then stupid civil engineers pull that garbage and make it even more difficult.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BACyclone
True in some cases, especially replacing 4 ways, but well-timed lights can be better. That is lights that allow the main throughway to hit green at every light if following the speed limit. It's one of the best ways to limit speeding. About two years ago, I drove University in Cedar Falls for the first time in over 20 years. All the roundabouts on that are annoying.
We have one in Florida where the main traffic flow is 90 degrees. It's amazing how easy it is to "turn left" because of the traffic circle because it's so easy to enter the circle from that direction. If it were a two way stop there would be dozens of accidents there with people trying to cut across.

The other good thing about traffic circles is the geometry:
1. Because they are generally designed with tight turning radii, traffic naturally slows down quite a bit. So even if there is a mishap, speeds are slow and the likelihood of injuries is low.
2. Accidents are generally merging errors so there are very few T-Bones and literally no head-ons. So again, safer.
 
True in some cases, especially replacing 4 ways, but well-timed lights can be better. That is lights that allow the main throughway to hit green at every light if following the speed limit. It's one of the best ways to limit speeding. About two years ago, I drove University in Cedar Falls for the first time in over 20 years. All the roundabouts on that are annoying.
I never suggested that they are a panacea. But in the right applications they are great, especially during off times when drivers are sitting at redlights with nobody else around. Mine is where the four main streets in a neighborhood come together. Generally would have a 4 way stop, but the roundabout makes stopping almost never necessary.
 
I tend to have a bit of a lead foot and I genuinely appreciate those who are alert and move back into the right lane when they can. I will generally (where possible) momentarily speed up a bit to prevent the kind fellow motorist from having to slow down after yielding the passing lane to me.

I really despise those who just drive in the left lane when not passing. They are called the driving lane and the passing lane for a reason. Everyone forgets to move back over once in a while, that's okay. When you find somone coming up behind you signal and get back into the driving lane. But some people seem to think that the passing lane is actually their own personal lane. They set the cruise at 2 mph under the limit and pull out a book to read.

I will often pass them on the right and then slow down until they are forced to get over and then speed up and go along my way. May be a little passive aggressive, but it makes me feel better that I’ve done something for my fellow drivers.
 
I will often pass them on the right and then slow down until they are forced to get over and then speed up and go along my way. May be a little passive aggressive, but it makes me feel better that I’ve done something for my fellow drivers.
Just curious, does anyone else do "flash to pass"? I usually come up on someone in the left lane and give them a few moments to notice and move over. If they don't (and clearly have room to move over) I give them a quick flash of the headlights to let them know I am there. Then if all else fails I will grudgingly pass on the right.

Mrs. Velo says that "flash to pass" is aggressive and pisses people off. Is anyone else using this feature or is Mrs. Velo right and I'm just being an *******?
 
Just curious, does anyone else do "flash to pass"? I usually come up on someone in the left lane and give them a few moments to notice and move over. If they don't (and clearly have room to move over) I give them a quick flash of the headlights to let them know I am there. Then if all else fails I will grudgingly pass on the right.

Mrs. Velo says that "flash to pass" is aggressive and pisses people off. Is anyone else using this feature or is Mrs. Velo right and I'm just being an *******?

Flash to pass feels redundant. If someone comes up from behind, the driver in front knows they have a desire to pass. If they’re not getting over, then they just don’t want to let you pass and no amount of light flashing is going to change that.
 
Flash to pass feels redundant. If someone comes up from behind, the driver in front knows they have a desire to pass. If they’re not getting over, then they just don’t want to let you pass and no amount of light flashing is going to change that.
Maybe, but there is an astonishing number of drivers who don't regularly check their mirrors.
 
And while we are on driving rants, why is it that American drivers only think they can merge in front of another car? I had one earlier in the week where a driver sped past me only to make a RH turn less than a minute later forcing me to slow down. There was clear road behind me.

I’ve had European colleagues baffled by this phenomenon. Every time a car wants to merge they always speed up and get in front, never slow down to go behind. Regardless of how much space is available in front or behind or if they intend to continue to drive faster than the car they just merged in front of.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron