He falls somewhere in between. He doesn't handle the ball well enough or have the natural stroke of a 2, but he's a bit on the small side, both in height and length to be considered a classic 3.
I hope he sticks around because he's an explosive player that can bring a defensive tenacity and above the rim, versatile game on offense. He's extremely raw, but there is potential there. I think his upside is definitely higher than Charles Boozer, but will never be as good as a Rahshon Clark.
If he was Rahshon good with some nice ball handling that would be great. I could really excited about that.
If he was Rahshon with really good ball handling, he wouldn't have been available last spring.
That's depressing. I was really hoping someone wasn't going to say he falls between. That usually means they aren't really great at either.
That is probably true. I wonder why we used a scholarship on him vs signing a true guard.
Remember reading something saying he was recruited to play the 2.
Remember reading something saying he was recruited to play the 2.
I just hope he stays. He'd be very comparable to Rahshon Clark. Very lengthy, but not the greatest ball handler or shooter. I think he could play the 2 or 3 depending on the lineup we wanted to go with. He could wreak havoc on the defense end of the floor and in the up-tempo game. He's an exciting player from everything I've seen and heard.
Well I don't want to say that. He's not a terrible shooter, but he needs to spend a lot of time working on his release and getting quality reps in the practice gym. His ball handling will most likely never be great, but I think he'll be able to tote the rock better than Rahshon could.
He's definitely closer to a 3, but he's rail thin and it would be nice if he were 6'6" or 6'7" instead of being in that 6'4"-6'5" range. I'm not going to say that an inch here or there and 25lbs is going to be his downfall, because a quality player can overcome that.