I guess I missed which troll got himself banned.
probably not banned just needed a 2nd username to back up his 1st username's posts
I guess I missed which troll got himself banned.
Let’s discuss criteria. This is mine:
I think:Let’s discuss criteria. This is mine:
I think you have to look at several factors: recruiting rankings, NFL draft picks, CFP appearances, national championships.
Why do you agree or disagree?
The thread is a B12 Statement thread about possible expansion.
If you want to start a thread about comparing conferences, please start one.
Or you could just state it right here, right now. Wonder why you won’t…I think:
So you think the PAC is a power conference but if the Big 12 picked up Cincy and BYU they would not be?Im not arguing and I’m not moving the goal posts. We’re talking about comparing conferences, post OU/TX departure (but you already know that). You correctly pointed out they have not left yet. Ok fine.
How do we compare conferences when they leave?
Or you could just state it right here, right now. Wonder why you won’t…
Reported for trying to derail the topic repeatedly.Or you could just state it right here, right now. Wonder why you won’t…
It is good to get a few posts under the belt of the new user name before the old one gets banned. Gives you a little plausible deniability.probably not banned just needed a 2nd username to back up his 1st username's posts
Reported for trying to derail the topic repeatedly.
The only way I will be banned is if rules are applied unevenly. So you are probably right. I am here to discuss ISU athletics just like everyone else.It is good to get a few posts under the belt of the new user name before the old one gets banned. Gives you a little plausible deniability.
It will get banned. He can't help himself.
Feels more like you're trying to pick a fight for some reason and getting annoyed because no one takes you seriously.The only way I will be banned is if rules are applied unevenly. So you are probably right. I am here to discuss ISU athletics just like everyone else.
I am not the only poster discussing relative conference strength in this very thread. I have given criteria. That criteria is unpopular for obvious reasons. So back to being labeled a hok troll for unpopular opinions.
When someone takes a username that indicates they are a Cyclone fan but clearly aren't they are a troll.The only way I will be banned is if rules are applied unevenly. So you are probably right. I am here to discuss ISU athletics just like everyone else.
I am not the only poster discussing relative conference strength in this very thread. I have given criteria. That criteria is unpopular for obvious reasons. So back to being labeled a hok troll for unpopular opinions.
Let’s discuss criteria. This is mine:
I think you have to look at several factors: recruiting rankings, NFL draft picks, CFP appearances, national championships.
Why do you agree or disagree?
CFP appearances? There have been a grand total of 9 teams that have made the CFP. Not a lot of data points there.Recruiting rankings, no.
NFL draft picks, no.
CFP appearances, sure.
National Championships, sure.
Then something like Massey or FPI to gauge the depth of the league as opposed to just looking at the top of it.
I have my doubts if Cyclone1969 is a Cyclone. He joined site July 2021 and seems like a Hawk troll.if anyone other than a cyclone posted this - not to mention all of the stalker posts that follow - theyd be banned
Even with OU and UT the big XII is the only p5 conference to never win a cfp game.CFP appearances? There have been a grand total of 9 teams that have made the CFP. Not a lot of data points there.
The only way I will be banned is if rules are applied unevenly. So you are probably right. I am here to discuss ISU athletics just like everyone else.
I am not the only poster discussing relative conference strength in this very thread. I have given criteria. That criteria is unpopular for obvious reasons. So back to being labeled a hok troll for unpopular opinions.
How about looking at final rankings on a three year rolling average or something like that? You'd think that, I don't know, how good teams actually are might be a good criteria.The only way I will be banned is if rules are applied unevenly. So you are probably right. I am here to discuss ISU athletics just like everyone else.
I am not the only poster discussing relative conference strength in this very thread. I have given criteria. That criteria is unpopular for obvious reasons. So back to being labeled a hok troll for unpopular opinions.