Big 12 Statement 9.1.2021

Mtowncyclone13

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2012
20,023
9,769
113
grundy center
What determines whether someone is powerful or not? If it's simply the inclusion of two historical powers that's a pretty weak argument for what conferences should be power 5.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
I have no issue with the statement.
But next time it may be more effective to release that we’re all waiting on OuT’s checks to arrive. And can wait years.
 

cyIclSoneU

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2016
3,300
4,562
113
What determines whether someone is powerful or not? If it's simply the inclusion of two historical powers that's a pretty weak argument for what conferences should be power 5.

Power 5 was what emerged from "BCS conference" when there were six conferences with BCS bowl autobids, and now there are five with New Year's Six bowl bids. It was never an official term; it's just what the media came up with based on perception.

No one knows what the bowl/playoff landscape will look like moving forward so it's not really clear what people will call the top conferences, or if the term will include the Big 12. If we get a 12-team playoff with 6 spots reserved for conference champs, then the Power Five leagues will make it basically every year and the 6th spot will go to an American/Mtn West/Sun Belt team, so I think the Power Five term would have a pretty good chance of surviving to refer to "the conferences that basically always make the playoff."
 

cyatheart

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 18, 2008
9,434
6,943
113
49
I don’t know why so many are complaining about this - with OuT/SEC/ESPN buyout looming, they can’t say anything else. They all could have landing spots elsewhere (I don’t actually think that’s the case) and they’d still have to say the same statement if they want the buyout money.

yes, thank you, there is nothing to say till the Check is in the bank
 

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
Power 5 was what emerged from "BCS conference" when there were six conferences with BCS bowl autobids, and now there are five with New Year's Six bowl bids. It was never an official term; it's just what the media came up with based on perception.

No one knows what the bowl/playoff landscape will look like moving forward so it's not really clear what people will call the top conferences, or if the term will include the Big 12. If we get a 12-team playoff with 6 spots reserved for conference champs, then the Power Five leagues will make it basically every year and the 6th spot will go to an American/Mtn West/Sun Belt team, so I think the Power Five term would have a pretty good chance of surviving to refer to "the conferences that basically always make the playoff."

I think that having multiple teams credibly capable of being included in a 12 team playoff will be important if that's the direction the sport decides to go. You don't want to be a one bid league if every bid is worth $40 million to the conferences.

Imagine ISU gets one slot in this hypothetical playoff and the SEC gets four. ISU's cut from the Big 12, assuming 10 teams, is $4 million. Vanderbilt's would be $10 million for sucking hind tit and being the conference whipping boy. And let's face it, Big 12 teams will need that playoff money because our TV deal will be static at best. The 12 team playoff is why OU and UT will leave even though they risk their big dog status.

If it is an 8 team playoff, ISU might get $3-3.5M for their cut, but if conferences get a max of 2 teams in it, a 16 team SEC might only receive $3.75-4.3M after the split. Much more equitable, but it removes much of the advantages of consolidating the top brands into one super conference built to suck up all the tv dollars out there, which is definitely something the Big 12 and the Alliance say they want.
 
Last edited: