Chris,
I think the talk of uofi dropping ISU is premature. I guess that I assumed that the Big 10 would keep 8 conference games just like the Big 12 had: 5 division and 3 other division. Who said that they would have 9 conference games?
It would only make sense that the new Big 12 go to nine conference games, as that would provide for a true round robin. Nobody really knows how Big 10 schedules are going to change next year,
In his V-Log for the week, he commented that uofi, with more conference games, would look to drop the ISU game.
Man, imagine if you had an actual opinion. You'd be dangerous.
I'm all for dropping iowa if it means ThH and the rest of the goon patrol leave our little corner of the internet.
Iowa could drop the game, but right now there's nothing that says the Big 10 is going to a nine game schedule. It would make more sense for them to have a rotation like the Big 12 had as opposed to a nine game schedule.
I'm curious what the Iowa reasons are for dropping it if the Big Ten goes to 9 conference games. Or do they just want to use that to get out of the contract because they want to drop it anyway.
Plus they are 12 for the time being, I think Chris is speculating that the Big 10 might expand further if Notre Dame sees the light.... I could see it next year....Iowa could drop the game, but right now there's nothing that says the Big 10 is going to a nine game schedule. It would make more sense for them to have a rotation like the Big 12 had as opposed to a nine game schedule.