We are talking "more loyal' as in dedicated to the team even during down timesReally? Even during those off years Iowa had thousands more fans in Kinnick than JT can hold. I can see the argument for basketball, but it really doesn't work for football unless you want to start using relative percentages (which you did until that final bolded overstatement).
Not "more fans" as in number of actual bodies
A percentage of ticket sales that goes away during down times is a measure of the percentage of fan base that doesn't support during down times.
You lost a higher % of your ticket buyers in your down years almost 9%.
ISU lost none. zip, zero nada, and actually increased by 1%
Is that a relative percentage.
There is no doubt Iowa has a much, much larger fanbase. So it is logical to say they will get more fans even when they are down. That also means on most Saturdays there are far more people not attending games than what the stadium holds. I imagine this year, iowa could have put 80K in their stadium for quite a few games. So in their down years, they were not only losing the 9% that they had been getting but the other 1-10% that couldn't get in because the stadium was sold out. So 9% is a very conservative number
ISU even increased NCC memberships in losing seasons. Highest number was two years ago. So ISU increased donors during losing seasons as well as ticket sales.
Why is that so hard to understand. A greater percentage of Iowa fans go bye, bye during down times. ISU fans actually stand tall and don't disappear.
Last edited: