Cubs-Red Sox Compensation

GoCubsGo

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2008
1,409
172
63
Seems like the price tag was a little on the hefty side for the Cubs, but by no means devestating.
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,591
12,040
113
42
Lee's Summit, MO
Seems like the price tag was a little on the hefty side for the Cubs, but by no means devestating.

No way! The Cubs most defiantly got the better deal here, and its really not even close. They give up a reliever with potential, but a reliever who is also been pretty injury prone. The Red Sox got the raw end of this deal...
 

GoCubsGo

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2008
1,409
172
63
No way! The Cubs most defiantly got the better deal here, and its really not even close. They give up a reliever with potential, but a reliever who is also been pretty injury prone. The Red Sox got the raw end of this deal...


My starting point is that I think it's dumb that the Cubs have to give up any players at all for hiring front-office personnel. Epstein broke his contract with the Sox, therefore it should be a matter of contract damages, i.e. a monetary penalty, that Epstein owes to the Sox (provided the Sox can prove damages, which is another issue). As the Cubs, I'm happy to cover any monetary losses Epstein suffers as a result, and if I'm Epstein, I insist the Cubs cover such losses as a condition to accepting the job. But the part where each team's players are getting mixed up in this just doesn't make any sense to me. It seems like it should be a monetary issue, period.
 

gocubs2118

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2006
18,599
2,829
113
37
Illinois
No way! The Cubs most defiantly got the better deal here, and its really not even close. They give up a reliever with potential, but a reliever who is also been pretty injury prone. The Red Sox got the raw end of this deal...

I think it's pretty fair for both sides. The Sox shouldn't have been expecting some prime prospect in return.
 

DJK15

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2008
3,690
138
63
My starting point is that I think it's dumb that the Cubs have to give up any players at all for hiring front-office personnel. Epstein broke his contract with the Sox, therefore it should be a matter of contract damages, i.e. a monetary penalty, that Epstein owes to the Sox (provided the Sox can prove damages, which is another issue). As the Cubs, I'm happy to cover any monetary losses Epstein suffers as a result, and if I'm Epstein, I insist the Cubs cover such losses as a condition to accepting the job. But the part where each team's players are getting mixed up in this just doesn't make any sense to me. It seems like it should be a monetary issue, period.

I agree 100%.

The fact that they originally asked for players like Garza and Brett Jackson makes it even more ridiculous.
 

ISUCubswin

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2011
24,267
7,158
113
My Playhouse
The sad thing is, even though this was (in the end) settled by the two teams, baseball would be a much better sport and probably gain many more fans if Bud Selig was not the President. He shows his bias for the Brewers just as often as Obama shows his love for the White Sox. I feel if this were a Brewers-Red Sox deal, Brewers would've gotten off much easier. I also think Selig is going to find a way to reduce Braun's suspension.
 

Bobber

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
8,880
576
113
Hudson, Iowa
The sad thing is, even though this was (in the end) settled by the two teams, baseball would be a much better sport and probably gain many more fans if Bud Selig was not the President. He shows his bias for the Brewers just as often as Obama shows his love for the White Sox. I feel if this were a Brewers-Red Sox deal, Brewers would've gotten off much easier. I also think Selig is going to find a way to reduce Braun's suspension.

I disagree. I think Selig has done a good job overall in really one of the most controversial times baseball has seen. MLB in general has done well under his watch.
 

Bobber

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
8,880
576
113
Hudson, Iowa
Glad this if finally behind the Cubs and Red Sox. I think the Cubs did okay on this and it could have been a lot more painful. Red Sox fans are probably a little unhappy.
 

DJK15

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2008
3,690
138
63
Glad this if finally behind the Cubs and Red Sox. I think the Cubs did okay on this and it could have been a lot more painful. Red Sox fans are probably a little unhappy.

Actually, it's not totally over yet. The Cubs and Sox also agreed to swap players to be named later... for some reason...
 

TheCaptain

Well-Known Member
Bookie
Jul 2, 2009
3,581
295
83
Iowa
Actually, it's not totally over yet. The Cubs and Sox also agreed to swap players to be named later... for some reason...


The PTBNL are to constitue an official trade since executives cannot be traded for players.
(It needed to be transacted as a trade)