Dodie vs Curtis

Billups06

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 18, 2006
1,519
1,609
113
I am not disagreeing with Jeremy that D.D. is a good player, but you can't compare him to Stinson. We all would love to have Stinson back in uniform right. Granted DD has a pure shot and good ball handling, but no one could take it to the hoop like Stinson, except for maybe Tinsley. Nothing towards Jeremy, but Stinson's one of kind.
 

CrossCyed

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
10,875
2,342
113
I think it was more that he looks like Curtis, minus the headband. He's no Curtis, but he reminded me a bit of him.
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
Yeah, I'm with CrossCyed. I can see a reflection of Stinson from Dodie. It's blurry, but could easily become a very clear one.
 

mike4cy

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2006
2,614
59
48
Urbandale
Even though these guys didn't play great tonight, I am really excited to watch them gel because there is a lot of potential out there. Also, I think they really enjoy playing as a team.
 

9seven

Member
Apr 15, 2006
722
0
16
39
Indianola/Boone
As great as Stinson was (and i wish he was back this year), he was not even in the same league as Tinsley.... Tinsley was a winner and wouldn't settle for anything less..... minus the Hampton game.... which is a swear word im my household...
 

CHim

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 20, 2006
1,208
420
83
I would take Stinson in a heartbeat his Frosh year, but after that he didn't seem to improve like people hoped he would. It seemed to become more about him after that year, especially his Junior year.
 

Johnny8

Member
Oct 18, 2006
308
2
18
Ames, IA
I might have to disagree about Stinson not being in the same league as Tinsley. Yes, Stinson did not improve as much as expected, but he was one heck of a player. And also remember that Tinsley was a transfer, and only played his junior and senior seasons at ISU. If Stinson stayed behind this year, I think he would look a lot like Tinsley did his senior year. That being said, Tinsley is still one of my favorite players, but his campaign ended with a real bad taste in the mouth of myself and fellow Cyclone fans. I guess they both have that in common as well.
 

wheels686

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2006
1,429
292
83
Grinnell, IA
dodie is more of a team player than stintson was, stintson had more talent but had a major attitude problem. i remember a game against iona last year where instead of running down to play defense he was chewing out one of the freshman, i think dunson will be better in time than stintson. Maybe not in points but as a true basketball player on the team
 

kurimski

Active Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
852
159
43
I think it's rather difficult to compare the two at this point. Maybe in a year or two comparisons can be made but it's really hard to right now. Stinson was a shoot first pass second type of player and he wasn't even the point guard on the team as blalock was even though stinson did handle the ball a lot. Dodie seems more of a true point guard where it's pass first shoot second type of player and seems more of a better team mate also. I would give anything to have stinson back this year and I'll bet after the NBA draft was over stinson wishes he would have stayed also.
 

mike4cy

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2006
2,614
59
48
Urbandale
Curtis was a scoring machine, and his freshman year I was tickled to have him. BUT, the guy was not a team player. I am very happy with the young guys we have now. I can't wait for Monday to see them again!
 

clones11

Active Member
Apr 2, 2006
537
166
43
39
Marion
Tinsley would take curtis to school and pack his lunch. As "good" as curt was he was no where near the player tinsley was ball handling wise driving wise shoot wise. most people dont give Tinsley credit for his shooting ability but he was over 40% from behind the arc in big 12 play. It would be a tragedy to even mension curtis in the same. Sentence as Tinsley
 

mike4cy

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2006
2,614
59
48
Urbandale
Tinsley would take curtis to school and pack his lunch. As "good" as curt was he was no where near the player tinsley was ball handling wise driving wise shoot wise. most people dont give Tinsley credit for his shooting ability but he was over 40% from behind the arc in big 12 play. It would be a tragedy to even mension curtis in the same. Sentence as Tinsley

I cant say that I dissagree with that statement, Tinsley was something special.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
I think Tinsley was too fast for Stinson, but Curtis is a bull that Tinsley was not. Dodie has a very long ways to go.
 

CloneFan65

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
2,701
950
113
Phoenix, AZ
Tinsley would take curtis to school and pack his lunch. As "good" as curt was he was no where near the player tinsley was ball handling wise driving wise shoot wise. most people dont give Tinsley credit for his shooting ability but he was over 40% from behind the arc in big 12 play. It would be a tragedy to even mension curtis in the same. Sentence as Tinsley

Agreed. Stinson compares more favorably to former Cyclones like Willoughby or Thigpen. But not at the level of a Tinsley.
 

Kyle

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
4,074
119
63
I don't think Dodie's game is that much like Stinson's at all. Dodie is much more of a shooter. Stinson was a slasher and was far more physical than Dodie, as evidenced by his huge rebounding ability.
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,462
19,624
113
I was at the game on Friday, and not once did I think Dodie was even in the same league as Stinson. He doesn't have the ballhandling skills, only had one assist, and however much you want to label him a team player the fact is he took a crapload of threes really early in the shot clock.

That comparison is not only very early, it's plain ridiculous in my mind.
 

scubapohl1

Member
Jun 1, 2006
339
13
18
Panama City Beach, FL
Everyone should keep in mind that Stinson was an off guard and Tinsley was a pure point guard. It is hard to fairly compare the two. The point is expected to look pass first and shoot second. Stinson was "expected" to look to score first and dish second.
Stinson was a much stronger player physically then Tinsley but Tinsley was a far better ball handler and shooter. Both great, just in different ways.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
No way will Dodie match Curtis by the time he graduates other than shooting percentage. Curtis at 215 is a tough cookie and will get to the NBA soon enough.
 

Cyclonic

Member
Apr 18, 2006
127
5
18
I would not jump to player comparison conclusions just yet. I'm not a fan of that, because they are distictly different. But, if I HAD to make a hasty comparison...Dodie reminds me of Kantrail Horton. Bigger bodied guard than we usually get. Good confidence and ability on the shot. Ability to play both the 1 and the 2. Not afraid to muscle up inside. This is all being said before we even see Mike Taylor.

Any word on if Taylor will play tonight?