ESPN, Fox Open Discussions for Next Big 12 Deal

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,649
63,712
113
Not exactly sure.
I don't know about him, but I've been to LA and I hated it. Full of fake people who only care about keeping up with the Joneses and making sure their physical appearance is kept in top shape.

San Diego on the other hand, was great and I'd go back in a heartbeat. I've been to Seattle and really enjoyed it too. I even liked San Francisco. But, if I lived in San Diego I'd still set aside 12 Saturdays a year to watch college football. There are 353 other days in the year to hike, surf, etc.

This is a silly argument. There are always tons of things to do anywhere you go. Whether those things are your personal favorites doesn't really matter. For you as an individual (and tellingly, maybe many of the people who live in or moved to California), maybe the kinds of things you can do in Southern California are the most important and best things in life and there's nothing wrong with that, but it's only one point of view. Sure, you can't go to Hollywood anywhere but LA. But you can do the vast majority of the things you can do in LA in Austin, TX, Ann Arbor, MI, etc. - trendy cities that also fill their college football stadiums. I hate to break it to you, but everyone has hobbies and tons of things they can do in their local area. That is not unique to California or the West Coast. California is still in general a great place and I definitely plan to go back (though not to LA if I can help it). It's just not a place full of dedicated college football fans. The money is where the dedicated fans are - the ones who prioritize supporting their favorite team over other activities that they enjoy.
Love San Diego, but I love ISU football more. I even take off work to make home games.
 

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,871
32,225
113
Parts Unknown
No, Cali is not really my scene, but I have been to the Texas Gulf, the Alabama Gulf, the Florida Gulf, the Florida Atlantic Coast, Georgia Coast, South Carolina Coast.
Several Great lake coasts too.

You know what I noticed in all those locations......A Beach.

I'm still waiting for the list of things you can only do in LA. That you cant do in say Miami. Or Houston, Or Savannah, or even Tallahassee.

The list of things besides the beach you can't do, in Atlanta, Dallas, hell even KC or DM.

I also want to you understand when I say there are things to do in other states that they don't really do in Cali Like hunting.
Cali gets about 975,000 hunting licenses a year for about 40 Million people, just barely over 2%.
Iowa gets about 640,000 hunting licenses a year for about 3.2 Million People. That is a much MUCH larger percentage of the population that goes hunting. 20% of Iowa's population hunts to be exact. Also of note most of the hunting seasons start up in the Fall. Right when football season starts.

But I doubt that many spend time on the beach in October in Iowa, But I'm sure Many are hunting. Just like I wonder how many actually are at the beach in LA in October, my guess not too many either.

The D.M Metro is 550,000 people to fill a stadium of 61K.

The LA Metro is 12.5 Million to fill a couple stadiums at 70-80K. I doubt all 12.5M are sitting at the beach every Saturday, and you cant use NFL because they dont play on Saturdays. Sure there is a lot to do but there is 25 times as many people to do all those things.

Relative to the number of people is there really that much more to do? Really?

Ok. You've never been.

That settles it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cyfanatic

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,611
10,101
113
38
I don't know about him, but I've been to LA and I hated it. Full of fake people who only care about keeping up with the Joneses and making sure their physical appearance is kept in top shape.

San Diego on the other hand, was great and I'd go back in a heartbeat. I've been to Seattle and really enjoyed it too. I even liked San Francisco. But, if I lived in San Diego I'd still set aside 12 Saturdays a year to watch college football. There are 353 other days in the year to hike, surf, etc.

This is a silly argument. There are always tons of things to do anywhere you go. Whether those things are your personal favorites doesn't really matter. For you as an individual (and tellingly, maybe many of the people who live in or moved to California), maybe the kinds of things you can do in Southern California are the most important and best things in life and there's nothing wrong with that, but it's only one point of view. Sure, you can't go to Hollywood anywhere but LA. But you can do the vast majority of the things you can do in LA in Austin, TX, Ann Arbor, MI, etc. - trendy cities that also fill their college football stadiums. I hate to break it to you, but everyone has hobbies and tons of things they can do in their local area. That is not unique to California or the West Coast. California is still in general a great place and I definitely plan to go back (though not to LA if I can help it). It's just not a place full of dedicated college football fans. The money is where the dedicated fans are - the ones who prioritize supporting their favorite team over other activities that they enjoy.
To your point when Michigan was bad Ann Arbor wasn’t showing up to games same way USC fans weren’t. Also comparing LA to Ann Arbor as having an equal amount of things to do is the hottest of hot takes.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cyfanatic

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,878
13,959
113
Reports coming out that the 12 team playoff has been approved. Might speed up things even more with OUT wanting to go to the SEC for when it kicks in.
Can't wait for Ok State and TAMU to make the CFP while OuT finish middle of the SEC West (or whatever setup they have). Heads will explode.
 

agrabes

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2006
1,686
510
113
To your point when Michigan was bad Ann Arbor wasn’t showing up to games same way USC fans weren’t. Also comparing LA to Ann Arbor as having an equal amount of things to do is the hottest of hot takes.
I think that's a fair point - in USC's specific case if they were good I do believe fans would come. I don't think that's the case for other teams in the PAC.

I think it all depends on what you're talking about in terms of "things to do." People in this thread are counting driving hours away from the city center of LA as "LA." And it's also a matter of personal taste. I get it, you're an MSU fan so you're not going to say you love Ann Arbor. But I travel to Michigan for work regularly. It's a trendy city and kind of a cultural center for Michigan. It's basically an extended outer suburb of Detroit, so you've got access to pro sports and the kinds of things you can only get in large cities such as major concerts, shows, etc. You have the Great Lakes - granted not the same kind of beach as California, etc, but still a beach. You also have hiking in the National Forests in the northern part of the state, etc.

You've got just about everything (minus Hollywood) in Ann Arbor and the Detroit Metro area that you have in LA, there's just less of it. I've been to both and I had a better time in Detroit - though I admit that kind of makes me sound like a crazy person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2speedy1

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,611
10,101
113
38
I think that's a fair point - in USC's specific case if they were good I do believe fans would come. I don't think that's the case for other teams in the PAC.

I think it all depends on what you're talking about in terms of "things to do." People in this thread are counting driving hours away from the city center of LA as "LA." And it's also a matter of personal taste. I get it, you're an MSU fan so you're not going to say you love Ann Arbor. But I travel to Michigan for work regularly. It's a trendy city and kind of a cultural center for Michigan. It's basically an extended outer suburb of Detroit, so you've got access to pro sports and the kinds of things you can only get in large cities such as major concerts, shows, etc. You have the Great Lakes - granted not the same kind of beach as California, etc, but still a beach. You also have hiking in the National Forests in the northern part of the state, etc.

You've got just about everything (minus Hollywood) in Ann Arbor and the Detroit Metro area that you have in LA, there's just less of it. I've been to both and I had a better time in Detroit - though I admit that kind of makes me sound like a crazy person.
Oh I went to Michigan after undergrad so I spent several years there. Ann Arbor is an awesome city, way better then east lansing but even the biggest Michigan homer would never compare it to LA.

I live in the metro area and yeah there are plenty of things to do but it just isn’t LA or the Bay Area and the weather is only one factor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyfanatic

Boxerdaddy

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2009
4,270
1,329
113
47
Beaverdale, IA
Again I am not just talking about Iowa, and I am not just talking about harvest and farmers. But Farming is just one thing that is going on here, even though I think that 1.4 percent number is rather low. Partly because if you farm, your wife does, your kids do, etc. so none of those will be going to the game usually.
In my home town, the tire shops stay open, the hardware stores stay open, the mechanics stay open, the elevators, ag chems all stay open during harvest, because all of those are the bread and butter of their business. And when they need something they need it. I doubt the Local mechanic, or tire shops are counted, nor the entire families, probably not the hardware stores etc. But those are all part of the ag businesses in the area, that keep everything running.
I get that, but how is it different than any other industry? Gas stations, malls, clothing stores, target, etc. All of these are open and booming on a weekend everywhere. I'm not calling you out or saying you're wrong as it definitely affects the ISU fanbase and other midwest fanbases. Just pointing out that farmers make up a very small number of our state by percentage.
 

agrabes

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2006
1,686
510
113
Oh I went to Michigan after undergrad so I spent several years there. Ann Arbor is an awesome city, way better then east lansing but even the biggest Michigan homer would never compare it to LA.

I live in the metro area and yeah there are plenty of things to do but it just isn’t LA or the Bay Area and the weather is only one factor.
I think part of it is maybe a perspective from someone who grew up in a rural area and has never lived in a major city vs. someone who does. I agree with you - the folks I know in Ann Arbor or the Detroit Metro would not say it's better than LA. In fact, a lot of them do wish they could go to places like LA or NYC, etc. It seems like something a lot of people who live in "secondary" major cities want - probably because only the very largest cities have something different and exciting for them. It does make me wonder if people who live in places like NYC, LA, London, Paris, etc ever want to move somewhere else.

For me, growing up on a farm and now living in a city that is small relative even to Detroit, once you reach a certain size all cities are the same to me. I think there are a lot of people like that. We're the ones who enjoy our lives in rural or minor cities, visit the big city for a few days, and (to bring it back to the theme) go to college football games on Saturdays.
 

Boxerdaddy

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2009
4,270
1,329
113
47
Beaverdale, IA
Also, I don't think people are using the socal life as an EXCUSE for not being as into CFB as other areas, just giving reasons that it does not get the viewership percentage as you would expect more options than your average area, and a lot of the population taking advantage of those options. SoCal has a high population so that is A draw to for networks, but...they certainly aren't getting the same per capita engagement as teams in the midwest or SEC country. That's my gut instinct, so if there are numbers to contradict that i'll gladly take back that statement. Just seems right from the info that I do have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyfanatic

agrabes

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2006
1,686
510
113
Also, I don't think people are using the socal life as an EXCUSE for not being as into CFB as other areas, just giving reasons that it does not get the viewership percentage as you would expect more options than your average area, and a lot of the population taking advantage of those options. SoCal has a high population so that is A draw to for networks, but...they certainly aren't getting the same per capita engagement as teams in the midwest or SEC country. That's my gut instinct, so if there are numbers to contradict that i'll gladly take back that statement. Just seems right from the info that I do have.
There are a lot of people doing exactly that - not saying you are or even necessarily anyone in this thread. But, the talking heads in the national media used it as an excuse for empty stadiums, even during big games. Their basic argument was - oh there are tons of fans of (Team X) but they just don't go to the games because it was such nice weather for going to the beach. These fans still care about and support their teams, they just have so many things to do they can't squeeze in time for the games. The national guys really only stopped this summer when USC & UCLA left for the B1G and the local PAC sportswriters still are doing it aggressively today.

I agree with you that you shouldn't expect the same per capita engagement out there and I don't think it's reasonable to say that you should judge a team's fan support as a percentage of people in the local metro area who support it. There are a ton of people in LA and most of them aren't there to watch college football.

I think it is reasonable to judge a team's fan support based on people who show up to games and those who watch on TV. You could have a dramatically smaller percent of locals who are fans and still have higher raw numbers of people in seats and TV viewers in some of these major cities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2speedy1

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,611
10,101
113
38
There are a lot of people doing exactly that - not saying you are or even necessarily anyone in this thread. But, the talking heads in the national media used it as an excuse for empty stadiums, even during big games. Their basic argument was - oh there are tons of fans of (Team X) but they just don't go to the games because it was such nice weather for going to the beach. These fans still care about and support their teams, they just have so many things to do they can't squeeze in time for the games. The national guys really only stopped this summer when USC & UCLA left for the B1G and the local PAC sportswriters still are doing it aggressively today.

I agree with you that you shouldn't expect the same per capita engagement out there and I don't think it's reasonable to say that you should judge a team's fan support as a percentage of people in the local metro area who support it. There are a ton of people in LA and most of them aren't there to watch college football.

I think it is reasonable to judge a team's fan support based on people who show up to games and those who watch on TV. You could have a dramatically smaller percent of locals who are fans and still have higher raw numbers of people in seats and TV viewers in some of these major cities.
I think there are a lot of people who watch the games but don’t want to waste 4-5 hours in traffic and dealing with the in game experience. So those people might be hanging out at a sports bar or watching at home and then as soon as the game is down they head out for other activities as opposed to the people at the game who have to spend another couple hours in traffic. Also while it sounds like Ames is a fantastic in game experience a lot of stadiums make the in game experience literal hell.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cyfanatic

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,634
7,487
113
Ok. You've never been.

That settles it.
I guess. You win, woo hoo. Cali has a beach and you did fun stuff in a desert once.

You still havent named 1 thing you can do In LA tha you cant do anywhere else.

Hell you just said you did things in the desert that were fun. Like you cant do those anywhere else, Most of which probably can be done on some recreational land in Iowa, or the dunes other places like Michigan or Colorado.

You also say that traffic is the problem in LA, to get to games, but then amazingly there is no traffic to get to any other activity apparently, even when some of those things are just as far or farther drive.

I dont doubt there are a lot of things to do. I just dont know if there is that much more to do relative to the number of people vs what there is to do other places to do relative to the number of people.

Hell I know tons of people that get together and target shoot on weekends, all kinds of guns. Hundreds of rounds of ammo each. I am sure that is not a very popular thing in Cali, especially LA, at least not by anyone other than the local gangs. Point is people have hobbies, and activities wherever they are, from mud trucks to dance classes, from catfishing to operas, people do what they do where ever. I have been to milk can cook outs several weekends, I am sure they dont even know what those are in LA. I have had huge fireworks shows and parties, with shrimp boils, and target shoots. I have had a hog roast, halloween party. All of which Im sure are not real popular in LA. Point being, you find things to do wherever.

A lot of the things there is to do in LA I probably would have no interest in, just like a lot of people would have no interest in activities I might be interested in.
 

MeanDean

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
Jan 5, 2009
14,631
20,879
113
Blue Grass IA-Jensen Beach FL
I disagree. There is absolutely that much to do there and a whole lot of it is free.

A team needs to bring it before I spend a few hundred instead of hEitting the beach for free.
Except Florida has generally great weather too during football season and great beaches and lots and lots of other entertainment attractions on par with Cali. If not on par, very close. Yet they seem to support Florida, FSU and Miami and to some extend UCF and USF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2speedy1

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,611
10,101
113
38
Except Florida has generally great weather too during football season and great beaches and lots and lots of other entertainment attractions on par with Cali. If not on par, very close. Yet they seem to support Florida, FSU and Miami and to some extend UCF and USF.
FSU and Miami stadiums have been empty the last couple years because again, they aren’t good. If the Cali teams put together some good seasons and are regularly ranked they will have full stadiums like they did during the Pete carrol era
 

MeanDean

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
Jan 5, 2009
14,631
20,879
113
Blue Grass IA-Jensen Beach FL
FSU and Miami stadiums have been empty the last couple years because again, they aren’t good. If the Cali teams put together some good seasons and are regularly ranked they will have full stadiums like they did during the Pete carrol era
But everyone is convinced they're all going to the BiG or SEC in the future.

If they're crappy and no one shows up or watches them on TV why is everyone wanting them?

Then ISU fills Jack Trice and we're nobody's child?

If only we had a beach I guess I wouldn't GAF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2speedy1

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,634
7,487
113
But everyone is convinced they're all going to the BiG or SEC in the future.

If they're crappy and no one shows up or watches them on TV why is everyone wanting them?

Then ISU fills Jack Trice and we're nobody's child?

If only we had a beach I guess I wouldn't GAF.
There is a nice beach On Saylorville Lake....:jimlad:
 

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,634
7,487
113
FSU and Miami stadiums have been empty the last couple years because again, they aren’t good. If the Cali teams put together some good seasons and are regularly ranked they will have full stadiums like they did during the Pete carrol era
FSU and Miami have not been even close to as empty as The Rose bowl, close to the Coliseum maybe.
Both USC and USCLA have been deploying tarps the last few years.

The Rose Bowl might as well tarp 75% of the stadium.
 

agrabes

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2006
1,686
510
113
I think there are a lot of people who watch the games but don’t want to waste 4-5 hours in traffic and dealing with the in game experience. So those people might be hanging out at a sports bar or watching at home and then as soon as the game is down they head out for other activities as opposed to the people at the game who have to spend another couple hours in traffic. Also while it sounds like Ames is a fantastic in game experience a lot of stadiums make the in game experience literal hell.
To be fair - I have 4 hours of driving to Ames and back (2 hours each way) on gamedays, plus generally 5-6 hours of tailgating after I got there. I guess I'm not sitting in traffic so it's a little less stressful but the amount of time is the same. A game is a full day event for me and I've been doing this since 2009 when I graduated. I did it even when our team was terrible and know many others who do it too. I'm not saying most ISU fans are like that, but many are. I think there are lot of fans of B12, B1G, and SEC schools like that.

I wouldn't doubt there are people who don't go in person due to the hassle. I've missed some games at the end of those 2-10 seasons myself. At least from my perspective though, it's a sign of a program on the decline when you can't even get the stadium a quarter full for major rivalry games like USC-UCLA in 2021.

 

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,611
10,101
113
38
FSU and Miami have not been even close to as empty as The Rose bowl, close to the Coliseum maybe.
Both USC and USCLA have been deploying tarps the last few years.

The Rose Bowl might as well tarp 75% of the stadium.
Go ahead and compare attendance numbers and they aren’t that far off. Again people show up when the teams are good and you lose a lot of fans when they aren’t. Even the blue bloods aren’t immune. But we can agree to disagree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyfanatic

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron