Just get the V8. If you are buying a truck, you should be looking for capability not mileage.
Don't need the power all the time. That's what the EcoBoost is for. 90% of F-150's sold are equipped with EcoBoost.
Just get the V8. If you are buying a truck, you should be looking for capability not mileage.
Honestly though if you're not paying the car payment I'd just get as much truck as you can.Don't need the power all the time. That's what the EcoBoost is for. 90% of F-150's sold are equipped with EcoBoost.
Honestly though if you're not paying the car payment I'd just get as much truck as you can.
So you'll actually be saving the person paying the bill money by getting the V8, that's called a win-win. Unless you want to be manly and get the big V8.Hey slick, EcoBoost is more expensive
So you'll actually be saving the person paying the bill money by getting the V8, that's called a win-win. Unless you want to be manly and get the big V8.
I'm sure you have more money than I do, I have all sorts of bills I have to pay.What's your address, I'll send you the bill moneybags.
Lawsuits filed by different groups in Ohio and Louisiana is more than just a few folks with a lawyer friend, and over 100 complaints filed with NHTSA. Do you know what NHTSA is without googling it?
You can't use an EPA estimate. They are notoriously wrong with new technology. You will not get better mileage towing with a V6 ecoboost as opposed to the V8. My brother in law has one and is is getting far worse towing mileage than the 7 year old Silverado he had before. He is not happy with the vehicle.
10,000 grand!?!?
Go to a Ford forum. There is not a single person there with Ecoboost that gets within 10 MPG of the EPA estimate. The EPA estimate is standard bad. It assumes you are driving low end of the final gear, which is somewhere between 45-55 MPH. It also assumes flat terrain, and the mighty ecoboost is constantly downshifting. The technology is junk, I am sorry. The V8 will actually get better mileage towing because it can actually stay in the highest gear a larger percentage of the time.What? Twin turbo V6s aren't new technology--I had one in my 2nd car and it was 8 years old at the time...15 years ago. You can argue that the EPA testing is high (or low if you are an ultramiler), but at least it is standardized. I'll take the data-driven analysis.
The big selling point for us was decent fuel economy (for a truck) and the towing capability. Every vehicle has terrible fuel economy when towing--towing capacity is another matter. We needed a truck that could reliably and comfortably tow the loads we needed. I think it is a step in the right direction.
Go to a Ford forum. There is not a single person there with Ecoboost that gets within 10 MPG of the EPA estimate. The EPA estimate is standard bad. It assumes you are driving low end of the final gear, which is somewhere between 45-55 MPH. It also assumes flat terrain, and the mighty ecoboost is constantly downshifting. The technology is junk, I am sorry. The V8 will actually get better mileage towing because it can actually stay in the highest gear a larger percentage of the time.
Go to a Ford forum. There is not a single person there with Ecoboost that gets within 10 MPG of the EPA estimate. The EPA estimate is standard bad. It assumes you are driving low end of the final gear, which is somewhere between 45-55 MPH. It also assumes flat terrain, and the mighty ecoboost is constantly downshifting. The technology is junk, I am sorry. The V8 will actually get better mileage towing because it can actually stay in the highest gear a larger percentage of the time.
I have a 2011 F-150 with the ecoboost. For the most part, I really like it and once it has gotten broken in, gets pretty good mileage for the type of driving I do.
My only issue with it sounds a little like what they are talking about in the lawsuit. Sometimes, when accelerating fairly rapidly, like getting on interstate or turning onto the highway, the engine seems to stall/pause for a second longer than I think it should when the transmission shifts.
Anyone else notice something similar?
I have a 2011 f-150 as well and have noticed what sounds like the exact same thing as you, but mine is not an eco boost. It seems to me like a transmission deal.
Go to a Ford forum. There is not a single person there with Ecoboost that gets within 10 MPG of the EPA estimate. The EPA estimate is standard bad. It assumes you are driving low end of the final gear, which is somewhere between 45-55 MPH. It also assumes flat terrain, and the mighty ecoboost is constantly downshifting. The technology is junk, I am sorry. The V8 will actually get better mileage towing because it can actually stay in the highest gear a larger percentage of the time.
Go to a Ford forum. There is not a single person there with Ecoboost that gets within 10 MPG of the EPA estimate. The EPA estimate is standard bad. It assumes you are driving low end of the final gear, which is somewhere between 45-55 MPH. It also assumes flat terrain, and the mighty ecoboost is constantly downshifting. The technology is junk, I am sorry. The V8 will actually get better mileage towing because it can actually stay in the highest gear a larger percentage of the time.
You have never actually been in or around an Eco that is towing have you.
Have you ever read the fine print on an EPA estimate? It says plus or minus 10.Which means that all these F150's are getting 5 mpg? lol, really?
I have ridden in one, so yes, I have. In my experience the 2012 Tacoma V6 is a more capable towing vehicle. It is actually about the same price though, so the choice is a toss up. I would buy the Tacoma because its residual value is so good.
Also, the turbo is going to reduce the life of the engine, especially if you tow. The turbo is not only going to increase the heat, but build more cylinder pressure. It provides power, but alot more wear and tear as well.