So Fred didn't bring in talented players? Well two of the players that Fred recruited are going to have their jerseys hung from the rafters. Not bad for somebody who couldn't recruit.
Where was that ever said?
So Fred didn't bring in talented players? Well two of the players that Fred recruited are going to have their jerseys hung from the rafters. Not bad for somebody who couldn't recruit.
Meh, Fred gave him **** in that regard , I'm not too concerned he didn't turn that **** into gold.He didn't "inherit short post players that have never been asked to box out".
These are all his posts.
Fred didn't leave him any posts that are still around and that's a problem, but their habits are not to be blamed on Fred.
So Fred didn't bring in talented players? Well two of the players that Fred recruited are going to have their jerseys hung from the rafters. Not bad for somebody who couldn't recruit.
...and it's not complete.I'm assuming he could probably do better since he's already pulled in one of our best recruiting classes.
I'm talking long term. He did a great job until the NBA rumors started swirling, and then it started to go down hill. I can't blame incoming freshmen for wanting to commit to a coach who is likely going to be there throughout their career.
I hadn't read the article yet, but holy crap it did.Did you read the Players Tribune article on Doug McDermott? It's funny that the "Fred hated recruiting" even made it in that
Did you read the Players Tribune article on Doug McDermott? It's funny that the "Fred hated recruiting" even made it in that
Fred "hating" recruiting (which I don't dispute) didn't seem to impact his ability to bring in high level players. The original post suggested that Prohm will do a better job recruiting because he wants to be here as evidenced by next year's class. I think the analysis is a bit more complicated than that. Fred may have hated recruiting but he still got a tremendous amount of talent on the Iowa State campus. Prohm may be able to do the same thing, or even exceed it, but I don't think that is a fair conclusion at this point.
Yeah I wasn't disputing your post, just pointing out you should read that article if you haven't. It's a good read
The problem that Fred's recruiting was causing was that it was creating a roster that was mainly juniors and seniors.Fred "hating" recruiting (which I don't dispute) didn't seem to impact his ability to bring in high level players. The original post suggested that Prohm will do a better job recruiting because he wants to be here as evidenced by next year's class. I think the analysis is a bit more complicated than that. Fred may have hated recruiting but he still got a tremendous amount of talent on the Iowa State campus. Prohm may be able to do the same thing, or even exceed it, but I don't think that is a fair conclusion at this point.
It's not really a problem until you have a lame duck head coach that does little recruiting at the end and leaves in June. We're largely seeing the problems caused from the recruiting cycle misssed due to Fred's slow departure for the NBA.The problem that Fred's recruiting was causing was that it was creating a roster that was mainly juniors and seniors.
We would be graduating almost the entire contributing roster in a 2 year stretch.
Fred "hating" recruiting (which I don't dispute) didn't seem to impact his ability to bring in high level players. The original post suggested that Prohm will do a better job recruiting because he wants to be here as evidenced by next year's class. I think the analysis is a bit more complicated than that. Fred may have hated recruiting but he still got a tremendous amount of talent on the Iowa State campus. Prohm may be able to do the same thing, or even exceed it, but I don't think that is a fair conclusion at this point.
Can we all stop the Fred wouldn't recruit narrative. Fred had a roster of upper classman and 2-3 sit out transfers earmarked for playing time once eligible leaving only a couple of scholarships for freshman. There wasn't much playing time available for 4 start recruits to play early thus, very difficult to get that type to Ames. Fred decided to target 5 star types who would contribute to a NCAA tourney run right away and fall back to a JC or late grad transfer if he didn't land the Diallo type (fall backs like Kane, McKay, Hogue and lesser extent BDJ). it worked and I have no doubt that if CFH had 6 scholarships in a year he'd land top talent (see Monte, Matt, and Georges).
The thing you have to remember admit Prohm, is that he is still a very young coach. He only has 5 years of head coaching under his belt. It seems like the last thing for coaches to master is in-game strategies like substitutions, fouling, timeouts, and when to change a defense. These are the things that just take time and repetition.
Compared to a 10 year coach, there are so many situations that a younger coach has not yet even seen. As he gets older he'll experience all the different scenarios within a game, and hopefully learn the best way to handle them.
My order is:
Recruiting is the key, then it's getting the players to buy in, then it's opponent scouting, then in-game coaching.
If they play this crap style of ball. And it wasn't only catering to the hoiberg seniors that made the team this hard to watch and it was just bad coaching yes I'll be over prohm.So you're over Prohm after one full year with his own players? Are you 16?
I think that is a player mentality. I've been searching on Google but can't find an article but I remember a McKay quote from his junior year right when he was able to start playing and he was saying how it is hard to get Monte's trust on lobs because Monte values the ball so much.Even south west Eastern Montana tech would be able to get their posts a few easy points a game. This team not only doesn't try get get big men involved, but they seem to intentionally ice them out of the game.