The issue for the B12 this year is not miz, nd, mich, etc. it is the fact that we only have ISU/BYU left as undefeated teams 5 weeks into the season. We need to have years where we end up with 2 or 3 teams that are either unbeaten or have only 1 (max 2) losses heading into the conf championship games. That means you can't have non-conf losses like:
cinci vs. pitt
wvu vs. pitt/psu
col vs. neb
ksu vs. ariz (terrible game for the b12 since it added a loss to one of the conf contenders automatically)
kan vs. unlv, ill
etc....
This year the B12 will have a very narrow path for possibly getting 2 teams:
ISU / BYU both undefeated in B12 title game
ISU undefeated vs. a 1 loss Col or Ari
ISU / Utah both with 1 loss in B12 title game
ISU unbeaten, Utah 2 losses, Utah wins B12 title, ISU is runner up with 1 loss
KSU / Utah both with 1 loss going into B12 title game
There are porbably some other less likely outcomes... but Utah & UCF losing really made the path very difficult for the B12 to get 2.
To me, this was always the case... I don't think there will be a lot of years where 9+ teams from the p2+ND have 2 or fewer losses... has not happened much in the past, unlikely to happen often going forward.
Key for B12 is to have as many teams as possible with 2 or fewer losses... then you have a shot at 2. This year is not looking good. But this does not mean every year will be terrible. Have to do better in non-conf matchups.