That I don't know. I know he was geared up so assumed he practiced some, but that doesn't mean it was anything intense.Rumor is he was at practice, not actively participating. Is that right?
That I don't know. I know he was geared up so assumed he practiced some, but that doesn't mean it was anything intense.Rumor is he was at practice, not actively participating. Is that right?
It wasn't a true practice, it was more of a walkthrough, but he was still out there. If it's a quad issue, that's something that can feel fine until you take off running or get hit. It's likely going to linger on all season.That I don't know. I know he was geared up so assumed he practiced some, but that doesn't mean it was anything intense.
Will be interesting to watch unfold. I'm guessing he'll be 100% for the ISU game and then 50% the remainder of the year, lol.It wasn't a true practice, it was more of a walkthrough, but he was still out there. If it's a quad issue, that's something that can feel fine until you take off running or get hit. It's likely going to linger on all season.
Yeah I agree I think overall, he'll be fine for the ISU game. Only way he's not is if he tweaks it during the first game.Will be interesting to watch unfold. I'm guessing he'll be 100% for the ISU game and then 50% the remainder of the year, lol.
The one upside he has is he's got good poise in the pocket and much more of a stationary guy. Not sure which quad it was to know if it could impact his mechanics at all.
Who is their next guy in line?He was practicing this weekend. Even if they held him out this coming weekend out of precautions, he'll almost certainly play against Iowa State. The difference between us losing Dekkers and them hypothetically losing McNamara is that Dekkers played like **** last year so it's not a drop off for us to trott out a newbie, whereas McDamara is an above average QB and it would be a massive drop off to the next in line.
Some transfer from WI. Labas would be, but he's Injured rnWho is their next guy in line?
Wisconsin fans say Hill is flat out not good.Yeah, my guess is they'd drop down to Deacon Hill. That would be an interesting matchup of young, highly recruited QBs (Hill was a borderline 4 star).
I don’t know if he is or not but you would think he would have played a lot last year if he was, because they sucked at QB. But, the fan base of a team losing a player will typically say they sucked or got massive NIL.Wisconsin fans say Hill is flat out not good.
Who really knows. I just saw a few Wisconsin fans comment on the tweet and they said he just wasn't very good. He's 2nd on the depth chart only because Labas is injured.I don’t know if he is or not but you would think he would have played a lot last year if he was, because they sucked at QB. But, the fan base of a team losing a player will typically say they sucked or got massive NIL.
Agree, and we’ve seen with Dekkers that being highly recruited doesn’t guarantee high performance. I do think Cade is getting undervalued here though… if Brian can get out of the way.Who really knows. I just saw a few Wisconsin fans comment on the tweet and they said he just wasn't very good. He's 2nd on the depth chart only because Labas is injured.
I think he's going to do fine. It's really all going to come down to the OL and the run game though. Cade didn't throw the ball that much at Michigan. They relied heavily on the run and were damn good at it. The year he took them to the title, there were 7 games where he didn't throw the ball 20+ times and there were 10 games where he had less than 200 yards passing.Agree, and we’ve seen with Dekkers that being highly recruited doesn’t guarantee high performance. I do think Cade is getting undervalued here though… if Brian can get out of the way.
All he has to do is not be terrible and he is a significant upgrade.I think he's going to do fine. It's really all going to come down to the OL and the run game though. Cade didn't throw the ball that much at Michigan. They relied heavily on the run and were damn good at it. The year he took them to the title, there were 7 games where he didn't throw the ball 20+ times and there were 10 games where he had less than 200 yards passing.
I'm not sure that means anything for his skillset but what it does show is that the team's success wasn't predicated really at all on Cade's arm.
One weird thing I see is our expected win % at Cincy is really low. ESPN only giving us a 34% chance to win that game. To me, that is one of the gettable game to try and earn 6 wins. New coach, roster overhaul, first year in the Big 12.Updated original post with latest outlooks after week 1.
One weird thing I see is our expected win % at Cincy is really low. ESPN only giving us a 34% chance to win that game. To me, that is one of the gettable game to try and earn 6 wins. New coach, roster overhaul, first year in the Big 12.
ESPN does have us at 57% chance to win against Iowa. Which seems a little high honestly
I think there are a couple key points...One weird thing I see is our expected win % at Cincy is really low. ESPN only giving us a 34% chance to win that game. To me, that is one of the gettable game to try and earn 6 wins. New coach, roster overhaul, first year in the Big 12.
ESPN does have us at 57% chance to win against Iowa. Which seems a little high honestly
Thought this was interesting... FPI has us favored in our first 4 games, then only 2 of our last 8.
Favored in 4 of 6 at home, underdog in 4 of 6 on the road.
View attachment 115859
EDIT:
Updating this with the week 1 results in (9/5/2023):
View attachment 116326
Win Total now at 6.472 and games we are favored in jumped from 6 to 8.
Biggest moves are on TCU (+15.5%), Baylor (+20.3%).
Baylor and TCU both moved from underdog to favored.
8 of 12 games improved our our win total outlook. OU, Cinci, Kansas, and KSU are the 4 that declined week to week.