I don't think we'll get a 1 seed (obviously) but those two guys are right that our compared to the other candidates for the 1 seed, our resume is equal or better in a lot of ways. The only one that I think might have a step over us, is Michigan because they won the conference. I also think that if you put our resume with Duke or Kansas's name on it, there wouldn't be a question that they'd get a 1 seed.
All of that being said, it is darn cool to even have teams mention us for that. It's really great that we'll get at least a 3 seed and we have an outside shot at a 2 seed.
It has been a pretty great weekend!
Put our resume up against Duke & Wisconsin, I'll argue all day that Iowa St. looks better, and should be ahead of these teams.
But the difference between Iowa St. and teams like KU, Villinova, Virginia, & Michigan, is they were all regular season champions in their conference, and the committee will reward them for that.
My opinion, Virginia should get the last #1. Yeah they didn't have the toughest schedule within the ACC, but they beat the teams in front of them, and they proved their toughness by winning the tournament. However, I fear they may get treated like Iowa St in 2000. Should be a 1, but the committee gives it to a name school.
Then I'd say KU, Villinova, & Michigan should be 2's. With Iowa St, Duke, & Wisconsin battling for the final 2 spot.