Last 1.7 seconds

[tigershoops31]

How do we not have the ball out where it was inbounded in front of our bench if they're going to say Babb was fouled before the touch? If the foul happened before the ball was touched it goes back to where it was inbounded.

Ridiculous last 2:00 with the foul after the block on Ejim (when do you ever see that called?) and they kept the count going when Clyburn was on Smart that last possession for probably 7 seconds before the screen picked him off for the last shot. We didn't help ourselves with a couple plays but there were definitely some questionable calls against us. Ughhhhh!

 

[cmjh10]

Those refs obviously didnt know the ******* rules of basketball. They should get their ***** fired for being complete dooshers. They had a great game and they ruined it by overcalling everything. Then, when it mattered, they folded under the pressure and let the home team steal a win. I hope every player on the team is ****** and comes back and ******* curb stomps Baylor on Saturday.

 

[spierceisu]

I am also baffled by the foul on Melvin after the block. The other guy was laying on the ground and he didn't fall on him, he took a few steps to go after the ball and got called for it. What is he supposed to do on that one?

 

[kingcy]

Good point.

 

[Bluffers]

I am also baffled by the foul on Melvin after the block. The other guy was laying on the ground and he didn't fall on him, he took a few steps to go after the ball and got called for it. What is he supposed to do on that one?

Seemed to me the guy called the ball out of bounds, when it didn't go out after a great athletic move, he changed the call to the foul. Tough call.

 

[tyler24]

Yes...Clyburn was on the ball for at least 5 seconds, I was wondering if they were ever going to call it, luckily for OSU, they didnt.

 

[cyclonefan1983]

Yes...Clyburn was on the ball for at least 5 seconds, I was wondering if they were ever going to call it, luckily for OSU, they didnt.

They were quickly redoing the 5 after it reach 4 each and every time!!

 

[State43]

Look on the bright side. We are going to kill these fools at the Hilton.

 

[Cycsk]

How do we not have the ball out where it was inbounded in front of our bench if they're going to say Babb was fouled before the touch? If the foul happened before the ball was touched it goes back to where it was inbounded.

Yes. I was surprised that nobody on our bench even seemed to be arguing for this.

 

[clonedude]

Yes. I was surprised that nobody on our bench even seemed to be arguing for this.

You should know by now that you will never see that happen. It's just the way it is.

The way we are getting screwed over by the refs on the road in the last couple minutes though is really starting to make me wonder if the refs realize that the ISU bench will not get on them for bad calls?

 

[AllInForISU]

Yes...Clyburn was on the ball for at least 5 seconds, I was wondering if they were ever going to call it, luckily for OSU, they didnt.

I watched the replay of this a few times. The ref would start counting but then would signal that he was not within 5 feet (based on his feet not his hands or body).

 

[Cycsk]

I watched the replay of this a few times. The ref would start counting but then would signal that he was not within 5 feet (based on his feet not his hands or body).

I can't recall ever seeing that call in a game-deciding situation.

 

[VeloClone]

I can't recall ever seeing that call in a game-deciding situation.

I can't remember specifics but I'm pretty sure I have seen KU get this call on two separate occasions in the final minute of a game when it was a one possession game or less.

 

[Cycsk]

I can't remember specifics but I'm pretty sure I have seen KU get this call on two separate occasions in the final minute of a game when it was a one possession game or less.

Of course, KU gets this call! Probably at home also! :unsure:

 

[berther48]

Yes. I was surprised that nobody on our bench even seemed to be arguing for this.

I assume they where all concerned about the time rather than the inbound spot. But both were critical to winning the game. I feel since we got the 1.7 seconds, meaning no time off, because no possession, we would get the ball at the original point of entry. Needless to say choas reigned.

Rebound on Sat. and win at home.
Go Cyclones!

 

[IcSyU]

I assume they where all concerned about the time rather than the inbound spot. But both were critical to winning the game. I feel since we got the 1.7 seconds, meaning no time off, because no possession, we would get the ball at the original point of entry. Needless to say choas reigned.

Rebound on Sat. and win at home.
Go Cyclones!

The applicable rules straight from the NCAA rulebook:

Rule 7 Section 6 Article 1:

Section 6. Throw-inArt. 1. The throw-in shall start and the throw-in team shall have team control when the ball is at the disposal of a player entitled to the throw-in.

Rule 10 Section 1 Penalty Section 1 Part A

PENALTY: (Section 1) Personal fouls apply toward the team-foul total and toward an individual’s five personal fouls for disqualification. The ball shall be put back in play by the offended player/team as follows:
a. A throw-in (no free throws) nearest to where the foul occurred for:
1. Each common foul before the bonus rule takes effect.
2. A player-control personal foul.
3. A team-control foul.

 

[ruxCYtable]

How do we not have the ball out where it was inbounded in front of our bench if they're going to say Babb was fouled before the touch? If the foul happened before the ball was touched it goes back to where it was inbounded.

This has already been discussed ad-nauseam today and you are wrong. Really becoming quite surprised at how many people thought this was the rule.

 

[IcSyU]

This has already been discussed ad-nauseam today and you are wrong. Really becoming quite surprised at how many people thought this was the rule.

I know because I messed it up in a middle school game last year and looked up the rule after the game. :wideeyed:

 

[Clones85']

This has already been discussed ad-nauseam today and you are wrong. Really becoming quite surprised at how many people thought this was the rule.

He posted the question last night right after the game. Nice try though.

 

[ruxCYtable]

He posted the question last night right after the game. Nice try though.

My apologies, I didn't see the time stamp. I don't think it called for a smart-*** comment, from a moderator no less.