Lineup? Parker at 149?

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,897
74,615
113
America
So how close is this then?

25 - Hawaiian
33 - Russian
41 - Redding
49 - Parker
57 - Preying Mantis
65 - David
74 - Broderson/Devine
84 - Coleman
97 - Cuban
Hwt - Schuyler
 
  • Like
Reactions: crablegs

Land Grant

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
1,060
898
113
Don’t think these lower weight changes will add wins. But I’m not going to say that athletes should starve themselves to death.
 

stuclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 5, 2013
4,398
13,947
113
Ames, IA
My best guess:

125: One of the Hawaiians
133: Ramazan
141: Redding
149: Parker or Degen. If Parker loses the wrestle off, I expect he will drop down to 141. Can't count out Cam here either
157: Carr
165: Schumacher or Kraisser
174: Broderson or Devine
184: Coleman
197: Bastiday
Hwt: Schuyler
 

crablegs

Well-Known Member
Mar 28, 2016
4,268
7,855
113
Don’t think these lower weight changes will add wins. But I’m not going to say that athletes should starve themselves to death.
I actually think the bump everyone from 33-65 will add wins to the lineup. ISU’s weakest weight by far is 165 which this bump completely fixes. You probably end up with a few less wins at 41 and 57, but vastly more from 65 and slightly more at 49.

I think the biggest question here is how Carr would fare at 65 in terms of NCAA placement. Is he big enough to beat someone like Marinelli? I’d like to see a lot of the matchups he’d have at 165, but it would be a tougher weight.
 

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,897
74,615
113
America
My best guess:

125: One of the Hawaiians
133: Ramazan
141: Redding
149: Parker or Degen. If Parker loses the wrestle off, I expect he will drop down to 141. Can't count out Cam here either
157: Carr
165: Schumacher or Kraisser
174: Broderson or Devine
184: Coleman
197: Bastiday
Hwt: Schuyler
Is David for sure not going up? I assumed he wasn't but didn't know if Parker bulking up was a part of a greater plan.
 

buf87

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2010
12,071
12,422
113
Iowa
125 Terukina
133 Ramazan
141 Redding
149 Parker/Degen/Robinson
157 Carr
165 Schumacher\ Kraisser
174 Broderson\Devine
184 Coleman
197 Yonger
285 Schuyler
 
Last edited:

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,897
74,615
113
America
125 Terukina
133 Ramazan
141 Redding
149 Parker/Degen/Robinson
157 Carr
165 Schumacher\ Kraisser
174 Broderson\Shapiro
184 Coleman
197 Yonger
285 Sculyer(sp)
Well, there you have it.
 

GetAwesome

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 29, 2010
2,623
4,642
113
Cedar Falls, IA
I'll admit I'm not super knowledgeable about roster construction with NCAA wrestling and the pros/cons of changing weight class in terms of team strategy (obviously cutting weight can be a harmful game to play for some), but wouldn't having Degen or Parker stuck behind one another at the same weight class be a waste in duals?

Would Degen and Carr slide up too? Not sure about Degen's frame, but Carr wrestles up at 74kg for freestyle.
 

jkbuff98

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2017
2,909
4,129
113
I was thinking maybe a little of both , they did that a couple of years ago when Parker beat Gomez
 

Land Grant

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
1,060
898
113
I actually think the bump everyone from 33-65 will add wins to the lineup. ISU’s weakest weight by far is 165 which this bump completely fixes. You probably end up with a few less wins at 41 and 57, but vastly more from 65 and slightly more at 49.

I think the biggest question here is how Carr would fare at 65 in terms of NCAA placement. Is he big enough to beat someone like Marinelli? I’d like to see a lot of the matchups he’d have at 165, but it would be a tougher weight.

Certainly moving Carr to 165 would help in the dual schedule. But I worry it would cost him at nationals. I don’t think Degen places as well at 157, or Parker at 149.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron