If McKay plays like this in the tournament and we go to at least the Sweet Sixteen, he's going pro.
IF it happens it would be a gigantic mistake.
If McKay plays like this in the tournament and we go to at least the Sweet Sixteen, he's going pro.
People don't like the comparison of production from just a year ago so here is some comparison from this year.
Per 40 Points Rebounds Assists Steals Blocks McKay 40 18.1 10.7 1.0 1.2 4.0 Okafor 40 23.2 12.2 1.8 1.0 1.9 Kaminsky 40 21.9 10.9 3.1 1.0 2.0
Wowza.People don't like the comparison of production from just a year ago so here is some comparison from this year.
Per 40 Points Rebounds Assists Steals Blocks McKay 40 18.1 10.7 1.0 1.2 4.0 Okafor 40 23.2 12.2 1.8 1.0 1.9 Kaminsky 40 21.9 10.9 3.1 1.0 2.0
Just because posters feel that it may be a misleading comparison doesn't necessarily mean they are offended. In fact, that is part of the good discussion you mentioned.This just goes to show that no matter what you post on cyclone fanatic, someone is going to get offended. I think this thread is fun and could provoke some good discussion.
If McKay could have played immediately this year it makes you wonder what kind of awards he could have won at years end. I remember telling people Ejim was going to end up being a beast later in his career to some people (sophomore year), and they thought I was nuts. All they saw was passes from Royce bouncing off his hands. I feel the same was about McKay next year.
Against KSU: 24 pts 10 rbs; Against KU: 19 pts, 5 rbs; Against BU: 10 pts, 9 rbs, 3 ast, 3 stl; Against NCCU: 17 pts, 8 rbs, 3 ast; Against UNC: 19 pts, 4 rbs, 2 ast; Against UCONN: 7 pts, 8 rbs (got in foul trouble, Hogue scored 34) Just had to go back and look at his stats. Only one game with less than 10 points. That's a pretty damn good tournament run.I loved Melvin, he's an all time ISU great and a had a great season last year. If there's one knock though, he didn't pay great in the tourney. Whether McKay's season is better or worse will rely on how he plays from here on out. As of now, I'd give the nod to Ejim. 18 and 8 every night is tough to beat.
Against KSU: 24 pts 10 rbs; Against KU: 19 pts, 5 rbs; Against BU: 10 pts, 9 rbs, 3 ast, 3 stl; Against NCCU: 17 pts, 8 rbs, 3 ast; Against UNC: 19 pts, 4 rbs, 2 ast; Against UCONN: 7 pts, 8 rbs (got in foul trouble, Hogue scored 34) Just had to go back and look at his stats. Only one game with less than 10 points. That's a pretty damn good tournament run.
Both have similarities, with their ability to score and get rebounds. The obvious difference is Melvin had a more polished offensive game and he was pretty good from deep. McKay is better defensively than Ejim and he can block shots very well. It basically comes down to whether you prefer a great shot blocker or a great mismatch from an offensive standpoint. Ejim, Niang and Hogue formed a very difficult-to-guard front court.
For this team I think McKay is best. For last year's team, Melvin might have been best, I'm not sure. DeAndre was pretty good defensively last year and it was hard to get to the rim as a PG when you had to get past him at 6'4. McKay might have been less valuable to last year's team.
I might give the slight, slight edge to McKay simply because we've never had a player like him under Hoiberg.
Somebody needs to forward to Greenberg - scary thing is much of Jameel's impact doesn't even show up in the stats - i.e. altering shots and terrifying opponents from even attempting to come in the paint. Guess what? He's getting better & better every game.People don't like the comparison of production from just a year ago so here is some comparison from this year.
Per 40 Points Rebounds Assists Steals Blocks McKay 40 18.1 10.7 1.0 1.2 4.0 Okafor 40 23.2 12.2 1.8 1.0 1.9 Kaminsky 40 21.9 10.9 3.1 1.0 2.0
Somebody needs to forward to Greenberg - scary thing is much of Jameel's impact doesn't even show up in the stats - i.e. altering shots and terrifying opponents from even attempting to come in the paint. Guess what? He's getting better & better every game.