I'm typically on the optimistic side and understand there is plenty of doom & gloom right now, but I hope the realists will lead this discussion.
To start off, I will point out that 2 years ago the eventual national champion UCONN Huskies lost 6 of 8 during a mid-season slump.
I'm typically on the optimistic side and understand there is plenty of doom & gloom right now, but I hope the realists will lead this discussion.
To start off, I will point out that 2 years ago the eventual national champion UCONN Huskies lost 6 of 8 during a mid-season slump.
Good perspective! I hope we can figure it out like they did.I'm typically on the optimistic side and understand there is plenty of doom & gloom right now, but I hope the realists will lead this discussion.
To start off, I will point out that 2 years ago the eventual national champion UCONN Huskies lost 6 of 8 during a mid-season slump.
My take is pretty much 100% of @Clonehomer and @NoCreativity takes above. Hard to see us right now finishing any better than three more losses, let's pessimistically drop one more too, so 20-8 (13-7), probably 5th-ish in the Big 12. Not "bad" objectively of course, but not what you'd hope from a 15-1 (5-0) start with the only loss on a buzzer-beater to the #1 team.
Our problems are way beyond Milan being out. Too many guys who are near-zeros on offense (Heise, Chatfield, Jackson, Watson) or who evidently can't see the floor at all (Nojus), and the talent/effort/focus/execution/physicality on defense in the frontcourt that was so critical to the previous three years is just not there this year.
Respectfully, to finish 20-8 would be crushing. It would be as disappointing of season as we would have ever had - relative to expectations. And not preseason expectations (because preseason expectations and rankings are beyond stupid) - but broad spectrum expectations (after the 15-1 start) from basically everyone (including the metrics) that this was indeed one of 4/5 best teams in college basketball.My take is pretty much 100% of @Clonehomer and @NoCreativity takes above. Hard to see us right now finishing any better than three more losses, let's pessimistically drop one more too, so 20-8 (13-7), probably 5th-ish in the Big 12. Not "bad" objectively of course, but not what you'd hope from a 15-1 (5-0) start with the only loss on a buzzer-beater to the #1 team.
Our problems are way beyond Milan being out. Too many guys who are near-zeros on offense (Heise, Chatfield, Jackson, Watson) or who evidently can't see the floor at all (Nojus), and the talent/effort/focus/execution/physicality on defense in the frontcourt that was so critical to the previous three years is just not there this year.
I'm not sure where you're reading this as something other than a more extreme version of the same thing I already said.Respectfully, to finish 20-8 would be crushing. It would be as disappointing of season as we would have ever had - relative to expectations. And not preseason expectations (because preseason expectations and rankings are beyond stupid) - but broad spectrum expectations (after the 15-1 start) from basically everyone (including the metrics) that this was indeed one of 4/5 best teams in college basketball.
Respectfully, to finish 20-8 would be crushing. It would be as disappointing of season as we would have ever had - relative to expectations. And not preseason expectations (because preseason expectations and rankings are beyond stupid) - but broad spectrum expectations (after the 15-1 start) from basically everyone (including the metrics) that this was indeed one of 4/5 best teams in college basketball.
This is maybe the most disappointing part of yesterday to me (along with a #1 seed likely being off the table too). With Houston dropping one at home and Kansas losing again, without that stinker yesterday we'd have been in descent position to catch Houston, with KU pretty deep in the rearview.Regular season conference title seems to be off the table. But real basketball starts in March. Figure out the issues now to make a run in March
You said "not bad objectively" referencing 20-8. I think that would indeed be objectively very badI'm not sure where you're reading this as something other than a more extreme version of the same thing I already said.
Yep certainly fair.We won’t finish 20-8 though. If we end the regular season at 20-8, yes that’s disappointing. But people will care more about the final record. Do we then finish with 9 or 10 losses? If we then end up at something like 28-9 or 28-10, then the regular season record probably doesn’t bother people anymore.