No relay on a Field Goal

dafarmer

Well-Known Member
Mar 17, 2012
7,252
6,935
113
SW Iowa
With every replay after a touchdown and on "controversial" plays, why was there no replay official stopping play. ISU probably would have lost anyway, but what is another minute or two going to matter.
 

goody2012

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 28, 2014
1,150
1,302
113
With every replay after a touchdown and on "controversial" plays, why was there no replay official stopping play. ISU probably would have lost anyway, but what is another minute or two going to matter.
There is no way you could tell with the replays they were showing, I'm shocked how many were convinced they made that...
 

AllInForISU

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
4,625
4,933
113
If a kick is higher than the uprights when it crosses the end line it may not be reviewed.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,170
7,766
113
Dubuque
As others have said rule prevents since over post not reviewable.

But even if with that. I doubt a camera would have better angle/view than 2 refs under the goal posts.

That said, it didn't seem like the ref was directly under the post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeloClone

HouClone

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2011
2,829
2,197
113
Houston
Kicker shouldn't let it get to an official decision. Kick it closer to the middle and we wouldn't be talking about this.
 

CycloneSpinning

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2022
1,055
1,354
113
44
As others have said rule prevents since over post not reviewable.

But even if with that. I doubt a camera would have better angle/view than 2 refs under the goal posts.

That said, it didn't seem like the ref was directly under the post.
That’s the part that surprised me. Why wasn’t he directly under the post looking up?
 

CYDJ

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2013
6,710
5,567
113
57
We got outplayed by Ohio.
Sure did. Had nothing to do with the field goal being good or not. The total lack of understanding the fact that two things can be true at once for some of you people astounds me.
 

1100011CS

Well-Known Member
Oct 5, 2007
16,127
5,845
113
Marshalltown
As others have said rule prevents since over post not reviewable.

But even if with that. I doubt a camera would have better angle/view than 2 refs under the goal posts.

That said, it didn't seem like the ref was directly under the post.
Why don't they have a camera attached to the pole looking up?
 

Drew0311

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2019
9,082
13,760
113
51
Norwalk, Iowa
I’m just shocked we can’t stick a couple go pros on top of the field goals so replays can be effective on this type of thing
 

Bigman38

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
Jul 27, 2010
20,236
20,391
113
38
Council Bluffs, IA
There’s never a reason to review it unless you put a camera on the refs forehead. Otherwise there’s no angle to overturn it.

I can’t tell from the replays either, but if the guy with the best angle said it was no good then there’s a pretty good chance it was no good. Not exactly a tough call.
 

MugNight

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 27, 2021
2,247
4,110
113
Here’s a screenshot I took from replaying the kick
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3050.jpeg
    IMG_3050.jpeg
    221.6 KB · Views: 45

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,845
62,419
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
$1200 worth of cameras would take care of this problem. No doubt no question. Not sure why we are still countung on humans to make so many decisions anymore. Wherever technology can take the place of humans in those positions, tthey should.
Could probably just put sensors in that automatically determine where the ball is in relationship to the goal posts extended.