BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,649
63,712
113
Not exactly sure.
6 feet and 15 minutes are not concrete numbers on contracting a virus. The more people you come into contact with increases the odds of transmission. It's how superspreading occurs.


That is what I've said, but I was told by several in other threads that I should not worry about those other shoppers in Target because I was by them for at least 15 minutes, and this was not from the anti-mask people, quite the opposite. It seems to change on a regular basis what some people say is correct and what isn't. I haven't gotten that from you, but a handful of other posters.
 

isutrevman

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2007
7,372
9,952
113
38
Ames, IA
Terrible idea. Ames is the #1 in Covid-19 new cases per capita. But don't worry about fallout: Reynolds will doctor any negative numbers.
Everytime someone talks about positive cases, I'll refer them to this:


It turns out that if you have a relatively small city, and mass test about 1/4 of the population, you are going to find cases. Does that mean they have active virus now? We don't know. Data would suggest 90% of them probably don't.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,649
63,712
113
Not exactly sure.
Terrible idea. Ames is the #1 in Covid-19 new cases per capita. But don't worry about fallout: Reynolds will doctor any negative numbers.


Hopefully you aren't going off the NY times article, President Winterstein is discussing what the correct numbers are with them for their corrections. Using NY times researched data is not a wise decision.
 

cycloneG

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2007
15,962
16,586
113
Off the grid
That is what I've said, but I was told by several in other threads that I should not worry about those other shoppers in Target because I was by them for at least 15 minutes, and this was not from the anti-mask people, quite the opposite. It seems to change on a regular basis what some people say is correct and what isn't. I haven't gotten that from you, but a handful of other posters.

Instead of 6 feet and 15 minutes, which is freaking arbitrary as hell, it should be an interaction count limit. People should limit the number of people they interact with in a day to x number of people.
 

dunar

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2007
2,359
580
113
West Des Moines, IA
We're going. Got new ISU masks ordered and ready to follow the guidelines to ensure we all get to go to six games this year if we want to!

I am very comfortable with safe distanced outdoor activities now - I went to Sturgis this year and can report that I stayed healthy. Avoided crows like the plague. Wait, too soon? Seriously, I didn't even get off the bike in Sturgis (where the news showed all the no mask, no social distance.) Rode the Hills like it was my last chance to do it, camped, had a great week with good friends! And have the shirt (and commemorative mask) to prove it.
 
  • Like
  • Friendly
Reactions: Aclone and 06_CY

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,649
63,712
113
Not exactly sure.
Instead of 6 feet and 15 minutes, which is freaking arbitrary as hell, it should be an interaction count limit. People should limit the number of people they interact with in a day to x number of people.


Hey, I agree with you. The less people you are around, the less chance you have to catch it. To me that always made logical sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cycloneG

cydsho

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2006
4,369
5,827
113
Omaha, NE
I stand corrected. Still though, 25k offers plenty of room. Im old enough to remember the crowds during the BVDV years. Plenty of room to space out.
What are you even talking about? We went to 5 bowl games during BVDV's years as AD. We were no where near averaging that low of an amount.
 

every_yard

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 25, 2006
1,524
1,485
113
Just go full capacity 25000 makes it impossible to distance 6 feet anyway

It would actually depend on the size of the groups. I don’t know how wide each seat space is, but for easy math, ifthe average group size is 3, then you could have about 4 seats between each group if needed. I would think that would be about 6 feet. Ideally, there’d be 6 feet between every group, but it won’t work out that way. If masks truly work and fans don’t high five or take their masks off, it should work. I am hopeful at least. I don’t envy anyone in decision making positions.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,663
65,963
113
LA LA Land
We're going. Got new ISU masks ordered and ready to follow the guidelines to ensure we all get to go to six games this year if we want to!

I am very comfortable with safe distanced outdoor activities now - I went to Sturgis this year and can report that I stayed healthy. Avoided crows like the plague. Wait, too soon? Seriously, I didn't even get off the bike in Sturgis (where the news showed all the no mask, no social distance.) Rode the Hills like it was my last chance to do it, camped, had a great week with good friends! And have the shirt (and commemorative mask) to prove it.

Crack down on any yokels for everyone else.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,502
74,236
113
Ankeny
6 feet and 15 minutes are not concrete numbers on contracting a virus. The more people you come into contact with increases the odds of transmission. It's how superspreading occurs.
And also the louder you are being and more yelling you are doing the greater distance viral particles are expelled. In a game environment that would increase the distance beyond 6 ft. 6 ft is just a guideline for when doing normal business and having conversations at room levels
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Angie and Aclone

Land Grant

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
1,060
898
113
Funny right here. Two folks immediately abuse my post. One cites a NY Times article as justification. The other says never trust the NY Times. And what are the magic Winterstein numbers?


Hopefully you aren't going off the NY times article, President Winterstein is discussing what the correct numbers are with them for their corrections. Using NY times researched data is not a wise decision.
 

Aclone

Well-Known Member
Dec 14, 2007
26,876
23,383
113
Des Moines, Ia.
Instead of 6 feet and 15 minutes, which is freaking arbitrary as hell, it should be an interaction count limit. People should limit the number of people they interact with in a day to x number of people.
I’m curious as to why that is.

it only takes one.
 

Dandy

Future CF Mod
Oct 11, 2012
22,127
17,364
113
Western Iowa
"Every person has a unique perspective of the COVID-19 pandemic. Some are fearless, others are cautious. Our measures will be too restrictive for some and too lenient for others. All we ask is that you respect others, follow our guidelines and support the Cyclones." - Jamie Pollard
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,649
63,712
113
Not exactly sure.
Funny right here. Two folks immediately abuse my post. One sites a NY Times article as justification. The other says never trust the NY Times. And what are the magic Winterstein numbers?

It was mentioned she was working on the corrected data with them. I don't remember the exact data they stated, but that is what Winterstein said in her presser.