The problem is if 4 one seeds getting to the final four is the norm, that means there is so much more separating the top from the rest. That’s not better.
It is better, if they're truly the best. The whole point of the tournaments is to find out who is best in the sport.
If it gets to the point where all 1 seeds win by 30+ pt margins and the 8th man on their bench is better than the lower seeds' starters, then I'm with you and would say something needs to change in the sport if nothing is competitive.
The 1 seeds (except Duke) all had competitive games in round of 32. Some of those 8/9 seeds definitely had good chances to win, they just didn't because 1 seeds were slightly better.
I'm obviously going far one way to prove a point vs the "there has to be upsets or it sucks" crowd by using all 1 seed argument, but people don't always say what they truly want, though.
As a quick, silly example off top of my head, I think a Final Four with: two 12 seeds, a 15 seed, and a 14 seed would suck donkey balls by comparison. It wouldn't be high-quality basketball and no one would really think "hey, we found the best team in CBB".
It's supposed to be really hard for the higher seed teams to win. And I think we're just going to have a more "chalk" year from time to time. There's plenty of tournament left, it sucks that our Cyclones are out, but i think the Sweet 16, Elite 8, and ultimately Final Four could produce some REALLY good games with VERY high quality basketball. That's what I want to see later in this bracket. Close, exciting games. I'm not gonna judge it after the first weekend of a 3 week tourney.
College Sports is different, but it doesn't suck, at least not yet. The college tournaments are both still a lot of fun. I'll join you if/when we move to a 2 megaconference only league. I have no doubt many things we really used to love will suck in college sports once that happens.