I would tread very cautiously here. We have a friend ofthe family in Atlanta driving on 285 (big city by-pass) in Atlanta onerainy afternoon last fall. Car stops in front of her. She swerves to avoid, butgrazes the car causing just minor plastic scrapes. Someone plows into herfrom behind, and then a minor chain reaction resulted.
She took a pretty good rap on the forehead and is 80+, so was understandablymentally stressed and rattled. Traffic cop comes up to interview her, and shetells about swerving to avoid the stopped cars and then getting hit. Guy wasnice as pie to her.
She finds out from talking to some of the other drivers involved, the cars werestopped in front of her because another fender bender had just happened. So inreality, she was just in the middle of a longer chain reaction. Side note, noambulances were called and she probably was the worst off physically with herhead knock.
She gets called to traffic court and here are 2 people in the accident withneck braces and lawyers wanting damages. The cop testified she was at fault andused her repeated responses to his questions about what happened of 'I'm notsure' against her.
She tried to get other people involved to testify, but they were too busy. Herinsurance company thought she was guilty, so a pay-off the cheapest route.She consulted a lawyer, but he said at this point there wasn't much he could doto reverse the 'at-fault' decision.
Bottom line, she got nailed for the whole accident. If it were me, I wouldn’tsay anything ,but what I did/saw. I wouldn’t speculate on anything. If my gutsensor went off that something wasn’t kosher, I would consult with our lawyerbefore heading to court. Unfortunately, my trust level for people doing theright thing isn’t as high as when I was younger.