I was just looking at the huge improvement we have made in just a few years in recruiting.
In 2008:
1 4*
7 3*
17 2*
In 2012:
16 3*
5 2*
And maybe a surprise tomorrow.
Future looks brighter and brighter!
I'm not sure where we are at this year, but it seems like some of our best recruits are hanging on by a fingernail and waiting to jump ship. I don't want to sound negative, but it sure looks like we have a lot of loose end to tie up before we get to feel good about this class.
I'm not sure where we are at this year, but it seems like some of our best recruits are hanging on by a fingernail and waiting to jump ship. I don't want to sound negative, but it sure looks like we have a lot of loose end to tie up before we get to feel good about this class.
rivals also evaluates more kids than they use to so you don't see as many 2 star players and more 3 stars.
What's a better indicator is that we have a lot more kids with multiple BCS offers than we use to. We use to out recruit Wyoming and Tulsa. Now we are competing with some good BCS schools
Those stats need some context to provide any meaning. I'd be interested to see how they compare to every other B12 school. If the ranking service is just handing out more 3* in 2012 compared to 2008, and thus other schools are showing a similar "improvement," then it doesn't mean much.
What's sick is that 40% of the players that were signed for 2008 are no longer with, or in Harper's case, never made the program. The good side of that is that the 60% percent that are left are or were major contributors to the team.