Should Randy Peterson be banned from Campbell interviews after his question?
- Thread starter iowastatefan1929
- Start date
Of course. The Bill of Right is uniquely ours. It is not a universal label for anything other than our first amendments. Your point??
On the other hand, speech has never been compelled by law in the history of English law...prior to recent UK and Canada actions. That is what I"m referencing and to your point, they do not have the 1st Amendment.
CapCity is Steve Deace. Allegedly
Ban? No.
Should Campbell be allowed to go off on him and maybe hit RP with his hat like the Captain and Gilligan for asking stupid inflammatory questions?
Yes.
Should Campbell be allowed to go off on him and maybe hit RP with his hat like the Captain and Gilligan for asking stupid inflammatory questions?
Yes.
Asking about it is fine. It's the way he words things that have a purpose to seek conflict instead of getting just a simple answer.
Simply asking 'How's the running game coming along, Coach?' is better than implying that it's a sh*t show.
CMC should have replied....... "yeah, you're right Randy... we shouldn't have allowed Epenesa to get that one tackle all game.... we'll get right to work on that for you.".
His job is essentially to help sell papers by covering ISU athletics. Asking dumb ass questions based on some false narrative from fanboy Chad and his fan site, is not that.
Should dbodeenisudm be banned from CF...for asking whether freedom of the press should be denied?
Fair question.
I request a safe space forum where we only say nice things.
Now we know. What else is different aboot Canada? Do they all wear those mountie hats?
I thought Deace was in prison?
wow we have a celebrity in da house
steve head on over to the cave where the real action is
you are truly a miracle baby!
steve head on over to the cave where the real action is
you are truly a miracle baby!
So, by your measure, no one should ever comment on anything they don't like. We should all just sit here and give positive thumbs up. Opinions are okay. It's going to be okay.
It's called holding someone accountable after repeat offenses. What's so hard to understand about that? The guy time and time again asks complete off the wall, irrelevant questions that are baseless and a waste of time. Why continue to allow that individual the privilege to cover your team?
