Almost hate bumping this thread, but after reading through it, I felt a little compelled.
I never saw the actual coverage until this morning. All I could think was, "Why the hell is this being shown now?" I think that is most people's anger at the event. It doesn't deserve coverage, especially when there are so many ***holes that will regurgitate it over and over.
Kids cry. It happens. If that was your kid, you'd be ****** off at the extended coverage. If you get mad at your kid for crying, then you're an *******. And please stop comparing this to some other tragedy in life. OF COURSE it's not the worst thing that will happen to a kid. Compare about ANYTHING to kids starving in another country and it pales in comparison.
The "wussification of America" argument just doesn't apply here either. Most posts I saw were appalled at the "repeated" showings and close-ups of the kid....that's it. Somehow it got turned into an argument about why a kid would cry in the first place. I guess it would be better if you found out that the parent of this child, embarrassed by the situation, went home and beat the kid for crying?
I guess I'm just curious to know if some of the defenders of the network have kids themselves. If yes and that kid was yours, would you say the same thing? How about if the kid had a mental disability ? Still ok?