"Bring on USC." LOL, no freaking way. Not buying this one bit.
Me either. Now if he was quoted as saying "If Gene Chizik can do it, so can I" then I'd believe it!:biggrin:
"Bring on USC." LOL, no freaking way. Not buying this one bit.
Standard practice, actually!!He could however, sign an initial agreement that covers the rough stuff with finite details to be signed on later, could he not?
IMO, if true, bad hire by ND. I think they could have gotten Urban had they waited and if not, Stoops still would have signed. Think about what they are trying to do. They are trying to win NCs. Bob Stoops has consistently lost big games. Now, maybe his team wasn' as talented as the team he played but the fact is that he hasn't won a big bowl game recently and he lost to Boise State. I think he will do a better job than Weis, however I don't see him being able to win NCs and likely not big bowl games. I really think he will regret this decision when he finds that he cannot get the defensive talent he needs to beat USC, Michigan, etc in games that mean something. This is just my opinion.
Does anyone else think that Venables would get a shot at taking over if Stoops is in fact gone?
Its a nice place to go if you never want to coach again:smile:Stoops would be an idiot to take the ND job.
Its a nice place to go if you never want to coach again:smile:
Stoops would be an idiot to take the ND job.
ND needs to fire whoever is on their selection committee for hiring coaches. They haven't had a good coach since Lou Holtz. Now they hire a guy who loses every big game he coaches.
Even if this is true and Stoops is going to ND. He would not sign the paperwork like the story claims. Some coaches wait 6 months to a year while attorneys go over the paper work. So them claiming he already put his name on the paper is rediculous. Not only that it would be a verbal agreement and Stoops would tell the Sooner AD before he would sign paperwork.
Aren't these the same guys who said Mr. Intramurals and his 10 win guarantee were out of Boulder?