Team looked the part minus 3pt shooting.
Need to beat Tech in the worst way. Hope they have it in them.
Need to beat Tech in the worst way. Hope they have it in them.
When did this happen?My favorite thing was that we didn't take a bunch of bad threes when we got behind by 10+. I only remember one 3PA (Kalscheur from way deep) that didn't seem in the flow of the offense. We trusted what was working (driving and looking for open guys in the paint for those dunks) and worked our way back methodically, then got it out for good threes that we just missed. Against just about any other team, or with a little bit better shooting, that will lead to a lot of wins.
My bad, dunks/dunk attempts.Pardon my ignorance, but what do those numbers represent? 45/50?
I have really joined the “I don’t give a rats ass what were ranked” crew. I’m sure we’ll get dropped real bad. Maybe not. Who cares. That’s such a circle jerk of people voting who largely have zero clue what their doing. Just win.
We won’t drop far from losing to Baylor by 5. Probably in the 11-15 range
I thought there was a sequence where Kalscheur missed a 3, we got the rebound and then he took another one from a few feet behind the line and missed. Maybe I'm misremembering?When did this happen?
I thought there was a sequence where Kalscheur missed a 3, we got the rebound and then he took another one from a few feet behind the line and missed. Maybe I'm misremembering?
Very different team since we do play defense, so in saying what I am about to say, I am keeping that in mind. But winning in Waco is a tough ordeal. We’ve had close calls but I think it’s been 8 straight losses down there. And only one win in the last 15 games down there or something like that.We may just take them down at their place. Over confidence on their part, chip on our shoulder, better shooting. We know our defense isn't going to vanish. It's a crazy game and season.
I was at the game; I never got the sense that we were playing well enough to win, but we still fought and had a chance at the end. That'll translate into winning some tough games over the next couple months.
I was there too, I would characterize it differently.
It wasn't that ISU didn't play well enough to win, it was Baylor didn't play badly enough to lose. They really played their "A" game, especially hitting tough clutch shots. They kept ISU at arms length but could not pull away.
If Baylor would have shot poorly, turned it over a few more times, or just generally not been at their best, they lose. Even with ISU shooting blindfolded from 3.
I was there too, I would characterize it differently.
It wasn't that ISU didn't play well enough to win, it was Baylor didn't play badly enough to lose. They really played their "A" game, especially hitting tough clutch shots. They kept ISU at arms length but could not pull away.
If Baylor would have shot poorly, turned it over a few more times, or just generally not been at their best, they lose. Even with ISU shooting blindfolded from 3.
I really think the boneheaded turnovers that led to transition points were more of a problem than the perimeter shooting. ISU gave up a few really easy steals that led to layups or dunks on the other end. If ISU had gotten those cleaned up ISU is in a position to win despite going 1 for 14 from the arc.
I'll have to look at that again because I also remember the second one being well behind the arc. I mentioned to Mrs. Velo that he was so wide open he could have taken a dribble and gotten closer to the arc and still been wide open. It was definitely longer than what was wise - especially for someone who is clearly struggling from 3.That happened but the second one was probably a foot behind the line, wide open, and in Rythm.