No way some of the PAC schools agree to sign BYU, no way.
If that would happen, I'd hunt down Larry myself and kill him.
maybe he is visiting the Utes.
No way some of the PAC schools agree to sign BYU, no way.
If that would happen, I'd hunt down Larry myself and kill him.
No way some of the PAC schools agree to sign BYU, no way.
If that would happen, I'd hunt down Larry myself and kill him.
face to face meetings/notes are not subject to FOIA
So why not use skype? Its not like the call would be recorded.
I think that all things considered, BYU would join the Big 12 over the Pac. The Pac spurned them a year ago, and they seem upset. They could have more money in the Big 12, and get their Texas foothold.
I have a really hard time believing that Air Force & New Mexico give the market penetration necessary to justify expanding to 12 schools.
No way those two schools capture enough viewers to not lose ISU money by expanding to 12.
Lose isn't the term I would use. The new FOX deal was going to net ISU $20 million more per year. Even if the addition of two universities like Air Force & New Mexico causes that $20 million to decrease to $10, that's still $10 million more than ISU saw with Nebraska, Colorado, and A&M. Throw the new ESPN deal on top of that and ISU is still sitting pretty.
The school that would be negatively impacted the most by an Air Force/New Mexico addition would probably be Oklahoma, possibly OK State. Oklahoma is now at the mercy of FOX to see what will happen to that TV deal as Texas can fall back on their $15 million per year from the LHN.
I think you need to check your math. A billion dollars divided by 10 schools divided by 13 years is only about $7.6 million per school annually and I think after some other expenses JP estimated ISU would only actually pocket $4-5 million per year.Lose isn't the term I would use. The new FOX deal was going to net ISU $20 million more per year. Even if the addition of two universities like Air Force & New Mexico causes that $20 million to decrease to $10, that's still $10 million more than ISU saw with Nebraska, Colorado, and A&M. Throw the new ESPN deal on top of that and ISU is still sitting pretty.
The school that would be negatively impacted the most by an Air Force/New Mexico addition would probably be Oklahoma, possibly OK State. Oklahoma is now at the mercy of FOX to see what will happen to that TV deal as Texas can fall back on their $15 million per year from the LHN.
I think you need to check your math. A billion dollars divided by 10 schools divided by 13 years is only about $7.6 million per school annually and I think after some other expenses JP estimated ISU would only actually pocket $4-5 million per year.
Its still outfitted as a crop duster. Once they take that equipment off they can use it againWhy can't the ISU plane ever go anywhere?
I think you need to check your math. A billion dollars divided by 10 schools divided by 13 years is only about $7.6 million per school annually and I think after some other expenses JP estimated ISU would only actually pocket $4-5 million per year.
Its still outfitted as a crop duster. Once they take that equipment off they can use it again![]()
$20 million was the number that I remember from last year - is that all TV combined?
Either way, ISU can't lose any more money with the addition of new universities - the worst case scenario would be to go back to where we started from.
If you are talking Fox/ESPN combined that gets you closer to the $20 million. Assuming (hoping) the league stays together and gets a quality replacement for aTm then we could still be looking at a nice payday in 2016.$20 million was the number that I remember from last year - is that all TV combined?
Either way, ISU can't lose any more money with the addition of new universities - the worst case scenario would be to go back to where we started from.
There is a lot of chatter on a SEC board that Missouri is the most likely team to follow aTm to the SEC. FWIW.