Interesting take. Better than ISU to the B1G.
More realistic take, yes. Better, no. ISU to the Big 10 would be by far the best scenario for ISU.
Now it more than likely will never happen, but its by far the best scenario.
Interesting take. Better than ISU to the B1G.
Maybe it is time to win ball games instead of sititng in the pasture whining.We don't add any t.v. sets. The only thing that matters is football. If we are indeed as good of fit for the Big 10 as you claim we are, we would have been in the Big 10 years ago. They don't want us, and I don't blame them.
I see the BigXII hooking up with ND, but not by ND jumping to the BigXII but by a merger between the BigXII and the Big East. THAT'S the shocker the Texas Tech AD was referring to. It will take time to make its self clear, but it will happen.
Will we go back to the Big Eight if MO jumps?
Problem is, espn and fox want 4 super conferences, not 5. So, I don't see this playing out unless it is only a temporary step until the good tv teams get raided out of one or both of those conferences to form the 4. Espn and fox own the checkbooks, so in this day and age you can be pretty sure who is calling the shots.
At least we finished up our Italian Job for bball. JP can now start revving up the Clone plane. Flight tracker anyone?As if JP is sitting naked in a bean bag chair eating Cheetos? How are you guys so sure that Jame isn't doing everything he can to ensure a light fluffy landing somewhere?
A lot of talk over at cougarblue about the Big 12 and what it could mean/or not mean to them.
View forum - Football | Cougarblue
A lot of talk over at cougarblue about the Big 12 and what it could mean/or not mean to them.
View forum - Football | Cougarblue
Maybe it is time to win ball games instead of sititng in the pasture whining.
Actually, ESPN is vehemently opposed to 4 super conferences. That's why they created the LHN.
We will never, ever, ever be allowed in the Big 10. Some of you on this board are insane.
No, actually, you're the one with the selective memory here. After those heading to the Pac 10 (minus A&M) decided it was in everyone's best interest to make the Big 12 work, there was full commitment going forward. Except for A&M - they began prostituting itself to the SEC and was dragged kicking and screaming back onto the Big 12. After the Big 12 Missile Crisis ended, the only school not committed to making it work was A&M. A year later, guess which is the only school making moves to leave?
And if you're referring to "unity" within the conference last year as things were heating up, what are you smoking? Missouri and Nebraska were fighting over one open spot on the B1G, Texas, A&M, TT, OU, and OSU were on their way to the Pac 10 while Baylor and Colorado were fighting over the remaining available spot, and Kansas, K-State, and.ISU were left wondering what was going to happen to them. that is COMPLETELY different from this year where only A&M has actively sought to leave conference while the remaining 9 members have been VOCALLY UNITED.
No, I think they created LHN to do exactly what it has done. Create a climate to destabilize the bigXII to help bring about super conferences and in the process own Texas for wherever they may end up in that realignment.
Tuesday August 30, 2011 - UPDATE:
Texas A&M spokesperson Jason Cook is confirming Tuesday morning that Texas A&M University President R. Bowen Loftin did not send a letter to Big 12 Chairman Brady Deaton.
News 3 reported a New York Times article Monday night that stated Loftin contacted Deaton to inform him that Texas A&M would formally withdraw from the conference -- most likely Tuesday.
The Times article quoted two "college officials with direct knowledge of the decision."
Texas A&M officials say the Time article is "totally inaccurate."
And I would make aTm pay the FULL penalties. No negotiations on lowering the price.
If the super conference thing goes down with 4 18 or 20 team leagues, we will be in the Big 10.