*****The Super, Mega, Huge Big 12 Expansion Thread*****

Status
Not open for further replies.

HuxleyClone

Member
Sep 16, 2007
248
9
18
TCU is unwanted by everyone. We dont need a school with 7k undergrads that sits in the middle of an area we've got completely covered tv-wise that just happens to have some tv recognition right now because theyve been good at football recently. They'll just diminish the pie for everyone else. And according to that estimate of fanbase sizes in the US, TCU would still fall below everyone else but baylor.. and thats despite all their success. What happens when they lose Patterson or they fall off due to not having as easy of schedules every year?

Florida gets us into florida markets. It cant hurt florida recruiting. And who knows, maybe it might help the b12 get some florida bowl ties again.

Exchange TCU for ISU and that is almost exactly what folks have said for months about us. And I for one was ticked off when USF called ISU out on the carpet. uSF may be a great market but their school is a complete joke. We already have a KSU with their crap academics.
 

rebecacy

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2007
4,507
270
83
At first glance I doubt that would be a workable case. The members who left and the ACC are much more culpable and likely to receive legal attention.
I'm having trouble connecting the dots on how OU could have any culpability. OU went to dairy queen and bought an extra large sundae so two people from another town went and bought Ben and Jerry's before all the ice cream was gone.
 

bosco

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2008
9,843
7,730
113
Des Moines
I think that 50% of 3rd tier money is a lot to ask. I'd be happy with 25%. Honestly, ISU does not DESERVE an equal share of LHN revenues unless it is a Big 12 Network. I think that 25% to 33% is palatable to UT and sharing the 1st and 2nd tier rights equally is great for everyone...surprised the OU is pushing this agenda since they voted AGAINST equal revenue sharing at every opportunity.

Once the bylaws are set, then they need to decide what they're going to do with membership. There's going to be a bunch of Big East schools out waiting to be snatched. Just BYU? Or BYU, WVU and USF? Or WVU, USF and Louisville?

Why not a B12 network. If UT is serious of saving the B12 and really want this conference to survive this is the way to do it. Who would want to leave then? The conference wouldn't need exorbitant exit fees. Schools would have wet dreams of wanting an invite. That is the difference between the B12 currently and the other power conferences.
 

CrossCyed

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
10,875
2,342
113
Let's worry about this small chance at fixing things before worrying about adding teams.
 

JRE1975

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 12, 2006
1,935
1,800
113
Lakewood Ranch, FL
I like the demands OU is making to keep the Big 12 alive, and if they get out on a limb with the PAC 12 not wanting them and Texas does not want to make changes, all other members should vote Texas out of the Big 12. Better have stability with reduced revenue than this crap. Besides with OU and some of the better Big East teams the TV money will be okay.
 

jbhtexas

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
14,321
4,370
113
Arlington, TX
TCU is unwanted by everyone. We dont need a school with 7k undergrads that sits in the middle of an area we've got completely covered tv-wise that just happens to have some tv recognition right now because theyve been good at football recently. They'll just diminish the pie for everyone else. And according to that estimate of fanbase sizes in the US, TCU would still fall below everyone else but baylor.. and thats despite all their success. What happens when they lose Patterson or they fall off due to not having as easy of schedules every year?

Florida gets us into florida markets. It cant hurt florida recruiting. And who knows, maybe it might help the b12 get some florida bowl ties again.

TCU, at $52,405,010, has a larger athletic budget than ISU, TT, and KSU. If they don't have a lot of fans, the ones they do have know how to support athletics.

Florida markets aren't worth losing non-profit status over should the IRS come sniffing around, and they aren't good for the student-athletes. TCU may not be a good fit, but I don't see Florida teams as a good fit either. If part of the argument against OU heading off to the Pac-12 or TAMU to the SEC is that it is not good for the student-athletes, then it would be hypocritical to add Florida teams.
 

cyman05

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 7, 2010
2,138
328
83
Yeah...never been a fan of adding USF unless we take all the BE schools.

If we go to 12, I think best guess is Louisville, BYU, TCU. I think the SEC will reconsider on WVU because I don't see anyone else going there and I don't believe they will leave it at 13 members.

I think you're right about West Virginia, but they have to be awfully embarrassed after being told no on the first time. Feel like a 2nd class citizen, but they won't care as long as they make it in.
 

cyman05

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 7, 2010
2,138
328
83
TCU, at $52,405,010, has a larger athletic budget than ISU, TT, and KSU. If they don't have a lot of fans, the ones they do have know how to support athletics.

Oil money out of the wazzoo in the Fort Worth area...
 

Clonefan94

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
11,186
6,221
113
Schaumburg, IL
I get that people like USF for market and recruiting, but I think you're asking for trouble adding a school that would be that far out on an island by themselves. It's the same thing we've all sat here and criticised the Pac-12 and OU for.

Kind of amazing isn't it. At the slightest sign of life, we all of a sudden turn into the vultures we've been complaining about all along in this thread. This is exactly why it looks so gloom for us outside of the Big XII.
 

cyman05

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 7, 2010
2,138
328
83
Exchange TCU for ISU and that is almost exactly what folks have said for months about us. And I for one was ticked off when USF called ISU out on the carpet. uSF may be a great market but their school is a complete joke. We already have a KSU with their crap academics.

1. I think it was actually UCF that called us out along with Vandy and Miss St.
2. I agree with you. Schools in the Big East have been saying the last couple weeks, PLEASE only take MU, KU, KSU...never ISU or Baylor. If it turns out that the Big 12 lives, its funny how now they'll be begging to all be taken together to the Big12ish. Stinks to have the tables turned if that's what happens.
 

jburke

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
4,576
833
113
45
Ankeny, IA
I've been away for a good portion of the day and I come on here to see some optimism that the Big 12 + some poached Big East members will stick around. What is the basis for this? Don't really want to read back through everything...

Speculation that Beebe is out, OU is staying, and revenue has been leveled, and with Pitt and Cus out in in BE and Rutgers and UCONN on hold.... A lot of new info today...
 

Cydwinder

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 9, 2010
1,379
700
113
London, UK
Exchange TCU for ISU and that is almost exactly what folks have said for months about us. And I for one was ticked off when USF called ISU out on the carpet. uSF may be a great market but their school is a complete joke. We already have a KSU with their crap academics.
Except that ISU has over 28k students. That's 4 times what TCU has.
 

MNCyGuy

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2009
11,644
551
83
Des Moines
Kind of amazing isn't it. At the slightest sign of life, we all of a sudden turn into the vultures we've been complaining about all along in this thread. This is exactly why it looks so gloom for us outside of the Big XII.

Yep. If the Big East gets further demolished and we can rescue some teams that make some sense as a package deal, that would be great. I like the idea of adding Louisville, Cincinnatti and West Virginia (or TCU if WVU goes SEC). Maybe if Mizzou actually leaves you start looking at a USF.
 

TexaClone

Member
Sep 30, 2009
186
11
18
Austin, TX
Except that ISU has over 28k students. That's 4 times what TCU has.

I still think Houston is a better choice - 38,000 students, third largest public university in Texas, one of the Top 50 American Research Universities(sound familiar?), huge TV market with no BCS team representation, they make almost all their money from non conference football games so their budget stinks($25million), but if you got them into a BCS conference, that's a LOT of alumni to get money from...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wesley

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,505
74,244
113
Ankeny
TCU, at $52,405,010, has a larger athletic budget than ISU, TT, and KSU. If they don't have a lot of fans, the ones they do have know how to support athletics.

Florida markets aren't worth losing non-profit status over should the IRS come sniffing around, and they aren't good for the student-athletes. TCU may not be a good fit, but I don't see Florida teams as a good fit either. If part of the argument against OU heading off to the Pac-12 or TAMU to the SEC is that it is not good for the student-athletes, then it would be hypocritical to add Florida teams.

Florida is already in a conference with at least 2 other members that we've talked about expanding.

As for TCU's athletic budget, what a potential add's budget is doesnt mean much. Its how much value they bring to everyone else. It doesnt matter if they have a billion dollar budget if their addition doesnt add, or worse costs the rest of the conference members money.
 

Cydwinder

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 9, 2010
1,379
700
113
London, UK
I still think Houston is a better choice - 38,000 students, third largest public university in Texas, one of the Top 50 American Research Universities(sound familiar?), huge TV market with no BCS team representation, they make almost all their money from non conference football games so their budget stinks($25million), but if you got them into a BCS conference, that's a LOT of alumni to get money from...
I agree completely. I would like to see Houston before TCU.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,505
74,244
113
Ankeny
I still think Houston is a better choice - 38,000 students, third largest public university in Texas, one of the Top 50 American Research Universities(sound familiar?), huge TV market with no BCS team representation, they make almost all their money from non conference football games so their budget stinks($25million), but if you got them into a BCS conference, that's a LOT of alumni to get money from...

I would agree. Theyre not a great choice by any means (i'll take most big east teams before them) but theyre still better than TCU (or the oddball SMU suggestion that gest thrown in once in awhile).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron