Twister Sister Summary - Another second half collapse...

acoustimac

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2009
9,273
10,873
113
Lamoni, IA
Everyone who has ever watched an ISU-Iowa game knows these are battles. Throw the records and stats out the window. Lately, Iowa has owned the Sisters with only last year's win at Hilton breaking a five game win streak by the Bluderettes.

This game started off cold cold cold. The sisters were 0-6 with four misses from deep. Iowa edged out 6-0 with three baskets by Czinano. Soares got the first basket with a three and promptly followed it with her first foul. The sisters were just not hitting anything. Five minutes into this one and ISU was 1-10 from the floor. Yet, the defense was keeping things closer than they could be 7-3 Iowa.

The sisters are chucking up three after three and barely drawing iron. In the meantime Iowa is going inside and building a lead. 9-3 after six minutes. Even point blank layups are missing. It’s now 1-15 from the floor. This is ugly.

Ryan finally converted a traditional three to end the misery and Donarski follows with two. On the good news front Jordao is in! Boom a three from Joens and the score was tied at 11 with a min left in the first. This was not a good offensive exhibition by either team. Neither team shooting well with ISU at 22% and 28% for Iowa. Quarter ends tied at 11.

ISU would take the lead on a drive by Donarski. but the offense is still way out of sync. On the plus side, Clark has yet to score. To this point, Ryan is forcing things and that allowed Iowa to retake the lead. We turned the ball over for the 9th time and Ryan is struggling to run the offense which has gone stone cold again. Seems like a theme this year. Four min into the second and we have two points 15-13 Iowa. Clark finally hits her first with 5 min remaining to give Iowa the lead 17-15. A trey after an offensive board and a complete defensive lapse would extend that lead to 20-15.

Weird possession of the game. We hit a three pointer with a foul committed underneath the basket, so we retain possession and then hit another three pointer to take a one point lead. 21-20. Soares followed that with a three and Clark answers right back ending an 11-0 ISU run. It was 26-23 sisters. Czinano picked up her second foul and I wondered if this would be a turning point. It didn't turn out that way. What we did see was Soares missing two free throws. That’s like a turnover in my book. This would be a theme for her tonight.

At halftime it’s 28-23 after a 13-3 ISU run. This is where you should just turn the game off because...

The offense in the third is just fits and stutters again. Soares picked up her third foul and all of a sudden the two on Czinano don't seem so big. Warnock follows two FT by Czinano to pull within two at 30-28. Czinano then picks up her third foul one minute in. Are the posts neutralizing each other? One critical factor is our free throw shooting being so bad at 3-9 to this point. Soares has three misses and it would get worse. What also makes it worse is Clark is warming up and hits a trey to make it a 1 point game again.

Then there is the ISU offense. Ryan’s drives today are just off. Goes up too hard. Is she expecting contact? Players are standing. No screens. When they do get open...misses.

Clark would hit a deep three after a Ryan miss to give Iowa a two point lead 36–34. Then Iowa State promptly turns the ball over and Iowa scores. The wheels were starting to fall off the bus. A perfect example of the ISU dysfunction was a horrible forced shot by Diew that barely hits the backboard. Iowa went on a 9-0 run and built a six point lead. The sisters in the mean time had six points in the quarter and was being outscored 17-6. It only got worse. Our defense was letting us down as well as Iowa continued to find open looks. We fouled. They made their free throws. Another prime example? Clark hits another downtowner and it’s a 43-37 lead for Iowa. What do we do? We follow with a inbounds five second call and boom…it’s 45-37. By the end of three this thing was nearly over. Iowa bombs the Sisters to the tune of 27-8 and has a 50-37 lead. I felt like I was watching the melt-down against North Carolina all over again.

The fourth ended up being a hodge hodge for ISU. The tough part here is that Iowa continues to gain confidence as Iowa State just struggles to even find itself. Didn't matter who shoots. for Iowa as keeps draining buckets and Iowa State keeps missing. Soares picked up her fourth foul as her defense is starting to suffer. With Iowa shooting nearly 50% from deep (and it wasn't just Clark) they would build a 60-44 lead.

Than a spark. On back to back possessions Joens would hit three pointers and all of a sudden it was 60-50. Was there life? Well, whatever life there was was squashed not by Iowa, but by the inexplicable decisions to stop feeding Ashley the ball. We chucked up some very unadvisable shots with Ashley sitting wide open in some cases. When this happened Iowa shut the door by extending the lead to 18. This game was effectively over. Iowa was content to dribble the clock away and force us to foul. They literally could not score every possession if they just dribble clock and we lose


Final 70-57

Observations


At this point we’ve seen the ISU offense disappear in the second half of two big games. Until they figure it out this team is going to struggle. Good teams will make them pay again and again. Just my instant reaction opinion, but this is barely a top 25 team right now. This offensive misfiring is a killer.

Soares - started good (a la North Carolina) and disappeared again. Horrid free throw shooting (0-6). 5 turnovers. Ten points with nearly all in the first half. Four fouls. This should be a real learning moment for her.

Joens - the only reason we were even in this game is her heroics. She had 15 and 7 and tried to put the team on her back, but the team wouldn't let her. Had to be frustrating.

Donarksi - Defense was ok. Clark we know is going to get hers and she eventually did (19), but that didn't beat us. Lexi had ten points and 4 assists.

Ryan - In many ways this was possibly her worst game as a floor general this year. Had 15 points, but couldn’t get the offense going. Not all her fault, but there were some bad moments and choices.

Offense - shooting this horribly will lose ISU lots of games. The Big 12 is a meat grinder with some very good offensive teams. If this team can't figure it out, what promised to be a once in a lifetime season will look like the 2021 Football team. Yes, they can do it, but they don't have a lot more time to figure it out.

The bench - Not ONE SINGLE POINT. Nada. Four rebounds. Five fouls. The depth I often brag about didn't show up tonight.

If you look at some of the stats things don't look as bad as this game really was. Iowa won the rebound battle by six. Meh. Iowa made one more free throw (but we missed 7 more). OK...that was bad...but most of those misses were on Soares. Three pointers? Man, it seemed like every time we turned around iowa was hitting one. But they made the EXACT same number as we did. Nine. The difference? We missed seven more attempts. Here's a big number. Assists. We had 9 on 20 baskets. Iowa? 18 on 26 baskets. Bingo. They were moving the ball and finding the open player. They were setting screens. We weren't.

This game leaves me with a lot of concerns. Not terrible ones, but we've now seen our offense starting to show a tendency to disappear. It's as if they forget what got them here in the first place. That's very disturbing. With games against tough Drake and Villanova squads coming up, ISU had better watch out. The defense still needs work. There were too many break downs in the second half. But the offense. Woof. That's two of the last three games where we couldn't find a bucket if a string were tied to the ball and it was run through the hoop. Soul searching time ladies. Soul searching time.
 

ISUCubswin

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2011
24,340
7,207
113
My Playhouse
Feels like we depend too much on 1-2 players being on instead of utilizing the ridiculous depth we have on this squad. Said the same thing with Creighton. One person isn’t on and the rest of the team forgets they can also take over.
 

loyalsons4evertrue

Well-Known Member
Sep 18, 2020
2,964
3,588
113
26
The thing I just get most frustrated with is the lack of adaptation when the thing you normally do really well (shoot from the outside), isn't going well.

We go straight to iso ball without moving and we still take contested deep 2's or 3's. We need to set picks, move the ball around, inside and outside, and find open cutting lanes. That's on coaching.

We have all the pieces to be a T10 team, but our coaching isn't helping at all. We can't just rely on a good shooting night to win. South Carolina (and I'm not comparing our program to theirs but alas) is not a team that shoots many threes. They do all the things I mentioned in the second paragraph, and yes they have super talented players to execute, but we could be a lot better just by moving the ball more.

We need to keep the defense on their toes.
 

exCYtable

Well-Known Member
Apr 15, 2010
4,771
8,448
113
The thing I just get most frustrated with is the lack of adaptation when the thing you normally do really well (shoot from the outside), isn't going well.

We go straight to iso ball without moving and we still take contested deep 2's or 3's. We need to set picks, move the ball around, inside and outside, and find open cutting lanes. That's on coaching.

We have all the pieces to be a T10 team, but our coaching isn't helping at all. We can't just rely on a good shooting night to win. South Carolina (and I'm not comparing our program to theirs but alas) is not a team that shoots many threes. They do all the things I mentioned in the second paragraph, and yes they have super talented players to execute, but we could be a lot better just by moving the ball more.

We need to keep the defense on their toes.
Winner winner chicken dinner
 

hiltonisheaven

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
1,149
1,093
113
Ankeny
This is 100% on the coaches. When they see the players standing around on offense they need to correct it. Get some movement. We’re terrible at iso ball and even if we were good at it (we’re NOT) it’s boring to watch. Add to that we stop playing defense when our shots aren’t falling. Coaches need to see what’s happening and correct it or more losses wil follow even though we have a lot of skilled players.
 

Fishhead

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
1,706
1,293
113
54
I haven’t seen a whole lot of games last year and this, but what happened to Diew? Unplayable now?
 

Cynonymous

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2015
1,473
358
83
The struggles boil down to offense construction. Calls for <player> to step up are hollow. They literally can't in this offense. We run two screens. One up top with the 5 for a screen and roll. The other is a pindown to seal the defending big to allow an entry pass to the 5 over the top. Everything else is standing around watching someone dribble the ball. Against weak teams we can reverse the ball fast enough for our guards to attack but that won't work vs any tourney level teams or in conference. ALL lulls in offense stem from this problem. If we aren't hitting an ISO 3 we are cooked. Emily stands out because she primarily gets the screen for PnR. There are no in-game adjustments to be made. It's a basic philosophy that needs to be changed.

The guards can at minimum run ghost screens and back cuts which will help our guards find driving lanes to attack. It's as though we don't trust anyone else to handle the ball, but yet rely on them for the same thing in ISO??? We have incredible talent at guard/forward but just need to move the defense a tad to open up their skillsets. All this will help free Ashley who also can benefit from attack dribbles and escape dribbles out of double teams to pass and re-establish. Soares/Kane need people cutting if the initial look isn't there. We have national championship caliber talent on this team, but it remains largely untapped.
 

kcdc4isu

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 2, 2009
4,815
2,565
113
west of dm east of cb
Just a question, how many on here have coached/played on a sports team? If a coach were your players always hitting every shot and did they do exactly like you told them to play every time? If a player did you always do exactly what the coach told you to do and did you always make every shot? I have coached and played and I can tell you in both cases games did not always go the way you planned. I saw nights when shots would not go in or passes would be dropped, players fumbled etc. and others when everything went as planned. Take this game and see what went wrong and work harder next time. Coaches can only give players a plan it is up to them to then make it happen and when one shot does not fall try some other shot but keep playing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: barometriclow

jctisu

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2017
8,726
10,674
113
Just a question, how many on here have coached/played on a sports team? If a coach were your players always hitting every shot and did they do exactly like you told them to play every time? If a player did you always do exactly what the coach told you to do and did you always make every shot? I have coached and played and I can tell you in both cases games did not always go the way you planned. I saw nights when shots would not go in or passes would be dropped, players fumbled etc. and others when everything went as planned. Take this game and see what went wrong and work harder next time. Coaches can only give players a plan it is up to them to then make it happen and when one shot does not fall try some other shot but keep playing.
Yes but the 2nd Half of games is not a random thing anymore dating back to last season. The offensive philosophy when other teams adjust OR when we aren’t making outside shots is not good.
 

Jammin’

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2009
613
587
93
Ames-Mia-Atx
Thanks for the write up. Couldn’t watch tonight at all, but have watched a few on ESPN +.

Of course I wish we were firing on all cylinders and gelling right away, but from what I’ve seen earlier, it’s going to be a season of patience for me.

There’s such a new vibe/flow to this team, but I think that’s ok. It’s a big if, but if they can gel this thing at the right time, which is hopefully is the goal, the ceiling is high, imo.
 

exCYtable

Well-Known Member
Apr 15, 2010
4,771
8,448
113
The struggles boil down to offense construction. Calls for <player> to step up are hollow. They literally can't in this offense. We run two screens. One up top with the 5 for a screen and roll. The other is a pindown to seal the defending big to allow an entry pass to the 5 over the top. Everything else is standing around watching someone dribble the ball. Against weak teams we can reverse the ball fast enough for our guards to attack but that won't work vs any tourney level teams or in conference. ALL lulls in offense stem from this problem. If we aren't hitting an ISO 3 we are cooked. Emily stands out because she primarily gets the screen for PnR. There are no in-game adjustments to be made. It's a basic philosophy that needs to be changed.

The guards can at minimum run ghost screens and back cuts which will help our guards find driving lanes to attack. It's as though we don't trust anyone else to handle the ball, but yet rely on them for the same thing in ISO??? We have incredible talent at guard/forward but just need to move the defense a tad to open up their skillsets. All this will help free Ashley who also can benefit from attack dribbles and escape dribbles out of double teams to pass and re-establish. Soares/Kane need people cutting if the initial look isn't there. We have national championship caliber talent on this team, but it remains largely untapped.
It's Prohmball
 

67CY

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
4,509
3,194
113
It does seem like they don’t get the ball to AJ enough when she’s open and on a roll
 

GetAwesome

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 29, 2010
2,625
4,649
113
Cedar Falls, IA
With Joens back for a fifth to stuff more stats, and the new capabilities of Soares in the mix, it just looks like confidence in the gameplan is not...quite...there. They've looked indecisive, a half step slow, against their quality opponents in the non con. I'm sure this will smooth out by conference play.

And I'm not keenly aware of the personalities in the locker room on the ladies side, but who is the leader on the floor? Is Ryan that steadying presence? Joens is the face of the team, but I don't get the sense she's a natural leader in terms of being able to focus a team in tense moments, or always elevate the play of others.

Lexi is a bit cold to get this year kicked off too, I'm looking forward to a good breakout game from her and get her back to the unconscious shooting she demonstrated last year.

That damn CyHawk game. Onto the next!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cyclonehomer