No guarantees at all this kid won’t leave his next school either…. but this is what everyone wanted. Isn’t it great!!If I'm the next school paying him more than UNLV, who's to say the kid wouldn't leave again for even more money?
But that's not any different than the way the rest of the world works. People get better job offers all the time.If I'm the next school paying him more than UNLV, who's to say the kid wouldn't leave again for even more money?
But that's not any different than the way the rest of the world works. People get better job offers all the time.
Isn't the main reason for going to college to get an education?
It used to be, but it certainly isn't anymore. It's equivalent to getting a job out of high school... for some.Isn't the main reason for going to college to get an education?
But that's not any different than the way the rest of the world works. People get better job offers all the time.
What scenario is this?This precise scenario was predicted when all this started, and is a necessary next step in solving the player payment problem. It just needs to happen at a few schools that matter first.
I can’t fault a guy for going for more money, but quitting on your team mid-season isn’t a great look.
If he leaves school, there's not anything legally enforceable. A scholarship is an agreement to play football in exchange for paying for school. If he quits the team and stops going to class, the agreement ends.Do they sign a contract with the school? Or sign an agreement?
If they do, then they do owe it to fulfill that agreement.
The scenario where players make a commitment on NIL but leaves mid-season due to the promises not being kept, because neither party is held to any kind of contract for services/payment.What scenario is this?
If he leaves school, there's not anything legally enforceable. A scholarship is an agreement to play football in exchange for paying for school. If he quits the team and stops going to class, the agreement ends.
Oh certainly, depending on the wording, they likely have some kind of recourse to stop payment, or potentially even recoup some money already paid. And I'd expect the UNLV collective to do exactly that. But I'm sure Sluka's representatives have already taken that possibly into account, before this decision was made.If he signed a deal with the unlv collective, then it would be enforceable though. Or at least it should be.
if i were UNLV I would 100% float this idea out there to the media.It seems to me there are 2 possibilities.
1. He truly didn’t get what they promised.
2. Another school came along with more money and he’s saying this to make himself look better.
I wonder if we’ll ever see his contract with unlv.