Looking forward to seeing Foster pair up with Young and Conditt with the small ball fours.Gives us two different looks each with a rim protector.
Just an attempt at dark humor hoping to remind everyone all we have are opinions because there are no absolutes.
What were Foster’s stats for the season?
I'd consider that in the neighborhood of 13 and 6. Given he's still a top 100 guy, but not a top 10 guy, I'd say that would be acceptable from his as a freshman.13 and 6 is a massive impact for a freshman in the Big 12. This year there are currently two freshmen in the entire league averaging more than 10 points per game - Jahmi'us Ramsey and Oscar Tshiebwe. Both were also blue chip recruits and both will be onto the NBA this year or next.
A reasonable expectation and successful freshman season for Foster would probably be something like 8-10 ppg and 4 rpg coupled with a shot blocking presence on D.
How does that compare to his Jr year?24 points per game (49% fg, 32% 3P, 75% ft), 9.7 rebounds per game, 3.7 blocks per game
He missed a ton of games this season with an injury and also had mono for a while too, so I think that needs to be taken into account as well.How does that compare to his Jr year?
How does that compare to his Jr year?
I agree.He missed a ton of games this season with an injury and also had mono for a while too, so I think that needs to be taken into account as well.
tHEy dOn'T TaKe STaTs FoR GaMEs nOt PlAyeD.He missed a ton of games this season with an injury and also had mono for a while too, so I think that needs to be taken into account as well.
I agree.
I like the FT %. How many 3s did he make this year.
It looks like he put in the work on his perimeter game.Xavier Foster 2018-2019:
14.4 points per game (54 % FG, 27% 3P, 51% FT), 11.8 rebounds per game, 6.2 blocks per game
It looks like he put in the work on his perimeter game.
And from the video's, his ball handling, he's not going to be Kevin Durant or anything but his game (and body) evolved in the last year, he's much more versatile. If he has similar improvement this offseason, he'll be a factor next year. Between he, Solo and Conditt, you have a wide variety of skills and more length than we've had in the frontcourt since...idk when.
You take the great recruits if you can get them. The key is piecing guys around him that will develop and not leave early as well. Prohm knows Xavier's situation and shouldn't be caught off guard if/when he wants to leave in 2 years. If Xavier leaves and at the same time Blackwell and Dubar leave, then you have a problem, but saying "you shouldn't go after high end recruits because they leave early" is pretty outrageous.
Coach Prohm has coached a lot of talented players and have played them too their strengths. A lot of them are in the NBA right now. If you don't think he's played certain guys to their strengths I'd absolutely love to here who exactly and what Coach Prohm could've done better.
IThis year has caused so many people to look at the glass half empty and not even think about looking at it half full.
.
Absolutely. And that's why I like what I'm hearing with Tre Jackson.. There's already been multiple stories about him staying longer than most after practice, getting up extra shots after a game, etc. That's the type of culture that builds strong programs. Other guys feed off of those types of player's work ethic.I think to add to your point is a key is developing a culture of working to get better. We constantly heard of Ejim, Niang & Long and others creating the culture of putting in the hours in the gym to develop their craft. Yes you need talent, Yes you need talent around you. But to develop the on court chemistry and teamwork it takes to be special takes a culture that breeds it. That is one aspect of coaching that often seems to be overlooked, yet is not just the coaches, but the leadership of key players as well.
I actually don't disagree with your point, but since you asked, who hasn't been played to their strengths?
1) I suggest the experiment with Michael Jacobsen at the 4 with a lot of time on the perimeter wasn't that successful. If, however, you counter that was to get Young more time in the post, then I would say that may have played more to Solomon's strengths.
2) I understand we struggle at the point with Tyrese injured, but Bolton is so loose with the rock in his hands that doesn't seem to play to his strength. He feels like a natural SG, where he can take the guy off the bounce, but to watch him with careless turnovers and then to put his head down and try to drive between two defenders is painful to watch. Again you might counter with who is better? I felt Nixon actually ran the point a bit better, if you can get him to not be so shot happy.
Yeah this year is a bit different. Prohm had to experiment at that 4 position and Mike ended up having to take on that role. I think that had more to do with no one else being capable of playing that position and Mike was the least worst of the bunch.I actually don't disagree with your point, but since you asked, who hasn't been played to their strengths?
1) I suggest the experiment with Michael Jacobsen at the 4 with a lot of time on the perimeter wasn't that successful. If, however, you counter that was to get Young more time in the post, then I would say that may have played more to Solomon's strengths.
2) I understand we struggle at the point with Tyrese injured, but Bolton is so loose with the rock in his hands that doesn't seem to play to his strength. He feels like a natural SG, where he can take the guy off the bounce, but to watch him with careless turnovers and then to put his head down and try to drive between two defenders is painful to watch. Again you might counter with who is better? I felt Nixon actually ran the point a bit better, if you can get him to not be so shot happy.