I just assumed Doyle signed a NDA when he got that fat payout to go away. I suppose he could have showed up and just didn't answer any questions.
I don't think ndas cover illegal activities, not sure what the scope of the questioning is thoughI just assumed Doyle signed a NDA when he got that fat payout to go away. I suppose he could have showed up and just didn't answer any questions.
If you can't answer questions under oath about why you aren't a racist, you are likely a very big racist.If you are truly innocent, I'm not sure why you would go to such lengths to delay the process and not talk. I get there is some legal posturing here, but refusing to talk seems odd to me.
From an outsiders perspective, it appears that the Ferentz's can't get out of their own way (again) and are stubbornly digging in thinking they can outlast any opposition. The whole thing feels gross to me.
They have delayed for over a year. The judge granted them a delay during last season to accommodate their schedule. They still never showed after the season was over and now won’t show until a judge rules on their motion to dismiss the case.To be fair, they are in the middle of a football season. My guess is the timing of the lawsuit was designed for media to take advantage of this angle. Until they're legally compelled to show up, they wont and they especially wont during the season.
That was their excuse last year to get their depositions pushed back. Then they were able to get removed from the lawsuit. Now they are re-added to the lawsuit. It's only been about delays with them. Ferentz's attorney basically said Kirk won't sit until he has immunity.To be fair, they are in the middle of a football season. My guess is the timing of the lawsuit was designed for media to take advantage of this angle. Until they're legally compelled to show up, they wont and they especially wont during the season.
Dude went to court over landscaping. He's a control freak.If you are truly innocent, I'm not sure why you would go to such lengths to delay the process and not talk. I get there is some legal posturing here, but refusing to talk seems odd to me.
From an outsiders perspective, it appears that the Ferentz's can't get out of their own way (again) and are stubbornly digging in thinking they can outlast any opposition. The whole thing feels gross to me.
NDAs do not prohibit you from testifying in court.I don't think ndas cover illegal activities, not sure what the scope of the questioning is though
Given he was the public fall guy for all the initial allegations, I would expect quite a few questions regarding his actions. In fact, I would go far as speculate that Doyle could be the deciding factor in how much this blows up (if at all).NDAs do not prohibit you from testifying in court.
I suppose Doyle could plead the 5th if his own actions were being questioned and if they would involve criminal civil rights violations
Brian taking a shot at Padilla to defend their decision to start Petras. Feels like the Deuce Hogan situation last year
Brian taking a shot at Padilla to defend their decision to start Petras. Feels like the Deuce Hogan situation last year
Good lord what is this presser lmao
Also he literally can't defer to the HC, since he doesn't answer to the HC. To skirt around state laws against nepotism, Brian answers directly to Barta.