Man they have a TON of guys that are easy to hate. All up and down the bench.
It’s a point of emphasis this year. And it is that because of coaches like Weber who pushed the limits for too long.Hilarious he got the warning. Bruce was out there defending fast breaks and nothing. Guess worse to block the scorer’s table than the other team’s players.
Point of emphasis is fine, and is long overdue, but it was absurd to stop an ISU possession for that without calling a T. The nosebleed section was unimpressed.It’s a point of emphasis this year. And it is that because of coaches like Weber who pushed the limits for too long.
We shall see as the season continues, but letting up nearly back to back 100 point games in college is like unheard of.
I know Tang is doing great and people love him. Something about him I can’t stand.
Or just a guy who wants the big cash prize and actual coaching and winning is just a side hustle.It takes an idiot or an ego maniac to want to coach anything at Texas.
History would suggest that good BB coaches don't stay at KState....You haven't watched K-State much because every broadcast including last night (King McClure) they talk about Tang turning down other opportunities waiting for the right one.
as a parent of small children... if you are giving a second warning then you are not in charge.What is the point of TWO warnings? Could there be 92 warnings? When does consequence actually kick in?
So, it's third is a T? I would say it should be a T at the second at least.as a parent of small children... if you are giving a second warning then you are not in charge.
no. 1 warning. especially if the warning is 'dont do this again or you will be in trouble'So, it's third is a T? I would say it should be a T at the second at least.
Maybe make it like the pros do with technicals. The warnings carry over so if you get a warning in one game, it hangs on you for the next game also.no. 1 warning. especially if the warning is 'dont do this again or you will be in trouble'