Zero. Basketball is scheduled the spring/summer after the season not way out in advance like football.How many of our non-conference games this season were set up right after our 2 win season?
Zero. Basketball is scheduled the spring/summer after the season not way out in advance like football.How many of our non-conference games this season were set up right after our 2 win season?
I’ve watched a lot of Drake games and consider them my second favorite team. Drake cannot match the size of Iowa State. BRE, Ward, Watson, and King will dominate the interior.Some of you guys are crazy. We really that terrified of Drake? I’d take our draw all day.
True, but totally stupid. Play a bunch of teams in the low 200s should make zero difference vs playing teams in the 300s. Any good team is winning all those games either way but it has a big impact on SOS.Ehhhh…our scheduling problem wasn’t not having power 5 teams. It was that we played the worst of the worst low level teams. Get a few better SWACC teams and it would help.
It's all really stupid.
To make it not be super stupid you'd need to penalize other conferences that suck balls compared to the Big 12.
And before "they can't control who is in their conference"...oh yes they can, two conferences have been scheduling the conference games for eveyrbody and they have passed on elite basketball programs like Kansas, UConn, Houston, Arizona, Baylor along with solid programs like Utah, BYU, ISU, KSU.
They intentionally choose to be average in basketball and create a Big 12 super league. We shouldn't be penalized that all other conferences basically suck now.
Here's the problem: conference tourney wins only sometimes matter. The committee uses different criteria exclusively to justify their choices and that's problematic.Guess that’s why KU didn’t try
The UConn board is completely up in arms as well- they say they got screwed as well- saying the same things as we are- but they say they got the best 2, 3, and 4 seed in the tournament…..
Selection Show Thread
I don't see much in the chat, so I guess we're doing this here.the-boneyard.com
From that thread. Someone is more worried about a team that had close losses to good teams vs a team who has 2 wins vs the best team. What?Much less worried about Iowa State than I am about the 2nd game against FAU. I just checked their damn schedule. Holy heck. They played some close games in losses against good teams/
That’s why they call them upsets. Not saying they will upset us, however that’s why they’re upsets.I’ve watched a lot of Drake games and consider them my second favorite team. Drake cannot match the size of Iowa State. BRE, Ward, Watson, and King will dominate the interior.
KSU should roll themHahahahahaha. K state/Iowa in the NIT!!!
4 of the top 10.View attachment 125797
True. Just drove through Champaign and the stench clouded my eyesight.
How about this from Caesar’s ?
Just look at all of those East teams.
Icky.
I’ve watched a lot of Drake games and consider them my second favorite team. Drake cannot match the size of Iowa State. BRE, Ward, Watson, and King will dominate the interior.
I'm probably wrong. But I say screw it and double down on our non conference scheduling in the future, and don't mess with our formula. Save the money on the buy in games, boost team confidence, continue to finish near the top in the big 12 and consistently make deep tourney runs.
Or, perhaps by playing UNI and Drake (and potentially some Dakota schools), we could actually boost revenues and non con SOS.
Drake isn’t winning their first game so they won’t even get a chance to lose to ISU.I’ve watched a lot of Drake games and consider them my second favorite team. Drake cannot match the size of Iowa State. BRE, Ward, Watson, and King will dominate the interior.